The Oppo A5 (2020) and Motorola Moto G8 Plus represent a sweet spot in the budget smartphone market, aiming to deliver essential features without breaking the bank. Both devices utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset, making a direct comparison of their other attributes crucial for discerning which offers the better overall experience. This analysis dives deep into display quality, performance, camera capabilities, and battery life to determine the victor.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus is the slightly better choice. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 665 processor, the Moto G8 Plus boasts a significantly brighter display at 581 nits and includes 15W fast charging, offering a more refined user experience despite similar core performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 21. Released 2019, October | 2019, October 24. Released 2019, October 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.4 x 9.1 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.36 in) | 158.4 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF
8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes (market dependent) | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Reverse wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mirror Black, Dazzling White | Dark Blue, Dark Red |
| Models | CPH1931, CPH1959, CPH1933, CPH1935, CPH1943 | XT2019, XT2019-2 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.2dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 87h |
| Camera | - |
Photo |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1505:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 79dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 168699 (v8)
GeekBench: 5641 (v4.4), 1385 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A5 (2020)
- Reverse wired charging for accessory top-ups
- Similar performance to Moto G8 Plus
- Competitive price point
- Lacks fast charging support
- Display brightness data unavailable
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
- Brighter display (581 nits)
- 15W fast charging
- Excellent battery endurance (87h)
- Camera specifications are vague
- Similar performance to Oppo A5 (2020)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus distinguishes itself with a measured peak brightness of 581 nits, a substantial advantage over the Oppo A5 (2020) which lacks published brightness data. This higher brightness translates to improved visibility under direct sunlight. Both displays share a contrast ratio of 1505:1, suggesting similar color reproduction capabilities. However, without detailed color gamut coverage data for the Oppo A5 (2020), the Moto G8 Plus’s brighter panel provides a clearer visual experience for most users.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having a 'Photo' camera, which is insufficient for a meaningful comparison. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, it’s impossible to determine a clear winner. The prevalence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras (often 2MP macro lenses) in this price segment suggests that image quality will heavily rely on the primary sensor, a specification currently unknown for both devices. Therefore, a definitive camera assessment cannot be made based on the provided data.
Performance
Both the Oppo A5 (2020) and Motorola Moto G8 Plus are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver cores. This means performance will be nearly identical for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. The absence of information regarding RAM configurations for the Oppo A5 (2020) makes it difficult to assess potential multitasking differences, but the shared chipset ensures a comparable user experience in most scenarios. Thermal management is likely similar, given the identical silicon.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo A5 (2020) and Motorola Moto G8 Plus achieve an endurance rating of 87 hours, indicating similar battery life under comparable usage patterns. However, the Moto G8 Plus supports 15W wired charging, a significant advantage over the Oppo A5 (2020)'s reverse wired charging only. While reverse charging is a useful feature, 15W charging allows for a much faster 0-100% charge time, reducing downtime and improving overall usability. The lack of mAh capacity data prevents a direct comparison of battery size, but the equal endurance rating suggests similar efficiency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A5 (2020) if you prioritize reverse wired charging for topping up accessories or other devices. Buy the Motorola Moto G8 Plus if you value a brighter, more visible display in outdoor conditions and faster charging speeds to minimize downtime. Both are excellent choices for users on a tight budget who need a reliable daily driver.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 665 in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 665 is a capable chipset for casual gaming, but demanding titles like PUBG Mobile will likely require reduced graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate on both the Oppo A5 (2020) and Motorola Moto G8 Plus. Expect playable performance at medium settings.
❓ Is the 87-hour endurance rating realistic for typical daily use?
The 87-hour endurance rating is based on a standardized test profile. Real-world battery life will vary depending on usage patterns, including screen-on time, app usage, and network conditions. Expect approximately one to two days of moderate use on either device.
❓ What type of USB port do these phones use?
Both the Oppo A5 (2020) and Motorola Moto G8 Plus utilize a microUSB port for charging and data transfer. This is a common standard for phones in this price range, but it's slower than the newer USB-C standard.
