The Oppo A3x and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13R represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$200 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches under the hood. The A3x leverages MediaTek’s Dimensity 6300, while the Redmi Note 13R opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2. This comparison will dissect these chipsets and their implications for everyday use, gaming, and battery life.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13R emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2, built on a more efficient 4nm process, offers a slight edge in CPU and GPU performance, alongside better thermal management. However, the Oppo A3x’s faster 45W charging is a significant advantage for those who value quick top-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 02 | 2024, May 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 02 | Available. Released 2024, May 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) | 168.6 x 76.3 x 8.2 mm (6.64 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.79 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min | 33W wired |
| Type | 5100 mAh | 5030 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sparkle Black, Starlight White, Starry Purple | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | CPH2681 | 2406ERN9CC |
| Price | ₹ 10,098 | About 180 EUR |
| SAR | 1.05 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo A3x
- Faster 45W charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially more vibrant image processing
- Slightly higher CPU clock speeds on prime cores
- Less efficient 6nm chipset
- Potential for more thermal throttling
- Unknown display specifications
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13R
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2 chipset
- Better sustained performance due to thermal efficiency
- Potentially longer battery life
- Slower 33W charging
- Potentially less vibrant image processing
- Unknown display specifications
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price bracket, both likely feature LCD panels with FHD+ resolution. The absence of information regarding refresh rates or PWM dimming makes it difficult to assess visual smoothness or eye comfort. We can assume both will target 60Hz refresh rates to maximize battery life. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within the budget constraints.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is impossible. However, it’s reasonable to assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, an ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The image processing algorithms will likely differ, with Oppo traditionally favoring more vibrant, saturated colors, while Xiaomi often aims for a more natural look. The absence of OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, which may struggle in low-light conditions. The quality of the primary sensor will be the most significant determinant of image quality.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13R’s Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2 (4nm) boasts a slight CPU clock speed advantage with its 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 cores compared to the Oppo A3x’s Dimensity 6300’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. More importantly, the 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon offers superior power efficiency. This translates to less heat generation under load, potentially mitigating performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the A3x’s Cortex-A76 cores are generally faster than the A55 cores found in both devices, the Snapdragon’s architecture and process node give it an edge in sustained performance. The Redmi Note 13R is likely to handle demanding apps and multitasking with slightly more headroom.
Battery Life
The Oppo A3x’s 45W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Redmi Note 13R’s 33W charging. Oppo claims a 50% charge in 30 minutes, which is a substantial benefit for users who need a quick power boost. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2’s superior efficiency in the Redmi Note 13R could offset a potentially smaller battery size, resulting in comparable real-world battery life. The A3x will excel in situations where rapid charging is paramount, while the Redmi Note 13R may offer slightly longer endurance between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A3x if you prioritize rapid charging and frequently need to quickly replenish your battery. Its 45W charging support significantly reduces downtime. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13R if you value a more efficient chipset, potentially better long-term performance, and a slightly more modern manufacturing process, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed. The Redmi Note 13R is the better choice for users who engage in moderate gaming or multitasking.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2 in the Redmi Note 13R handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with a stable frame rate. While it won't deliver the highest graphical fidelity, its efficiency will prevent significant overheating and throttling during extended gaming sessions, providing a more consistent experience than the Dimensity 6300 might offer.
❓ How much faster is the 45W charging on the Oppo A3x compared to the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 13R in real-world use?
Oppo claims a 50% charge in 30 minutes with the A3x’s 45W charging. The Redmi Note 13R’s 33W charging will likely take closer to 45-60 minutes to reach the same level. This difference is most noticeable for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 13R’s 4nm process make a significant difference in battery life?
Yes, the 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2 is more power-efficient than the 6nm process used in the Dimensity 6300. This translates to lower power consumption for the same tasks, potentially resulting in a noticeable improvement in battery life, especially during prolonged use or gaming.
