The Oppo A3x represents a modern, budget-focused approach, leveraging the efficiency of the Dimensity 6300 chipset. Conversely, the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom, while older, boasts the flagship Snapdragon 855, a chip that once defined high-end Android performance. This comparison dissects the trade-offs between newer efficiency and established power, helping you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users in 2024, the Oppo A3x offers a better overall package. Its 45W charging and more modern chipset architecture provide a smoother daily experience and faster top-ups, outweighing the Reno 10x Zoom’s older, though still capable, Snapdragon 855. The Reno 10x Zoom remains viable for those prioritizing raw, sustained performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 02 | 2019, April. Released 2019, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 02 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF OIS, 5x optical zoom, 10x hybrid zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min | 20W wired |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sparkle Black, Starlight White, Starry Purple | Ocean Green, Jet Black, Mist Pink, Ocean Blue |
| Models | CPH2681 | CPH1919, PCCM00 |
| Price | ₹ 10,098 | About 1020 EUR |
| SAR | 1.05 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 107h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.7 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 364220 (v7), 407473 (v8)
GeekBench: 10395 (v4.4), 2103 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A3x
- Faster 45W charging with PD2.0
- More modern and efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Likely better software support and updates
- Detailed camera specifications are unknown
- Display specifications are not fully available
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
- Proven Snapdragon 855 performance
- Potential for advanced zoom capabilities (based on name)
- Solid battery endurance (107h rating)
- Slower 20W charging
- Older chipset architecture and potential for throttling
- Battery degradation likely due to age
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s display is rated at 440 nits of peak brightness, a figure that feels dated compared to modern panels. While the 'infinite' contrast ratio suggests a good OLED experience, the A3x’s display specifications are not provided, but given its market positioning, it likely offers comparable or even improved brightness and color accuracy. The Reno 10x Zoom’s age also means it lacks features like high refresh rates common in the A3x’s price bracket, potentially resulting in a less fluid visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. The Reno 10x Zoom’s name suggests a focus on zoom capabilities, likely utilizing a periscope lens system. However, without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality definitively. The A3x’s camera system is likely more focused on providing a balanced experience for everyday photography. The Reno 10x Zoom’s age may also mean its image processing algorithms are less refined than those found in the A3x.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A3x’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) utilizes a more modern architecture than the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7nm) found in the Reno 10x Zoom. While the Snapdragon 855 boasts a higher peak CPU clock speed (2.84 GHz vs 2.4 GHz), the Dimensity 6300’s newer process node and core design generally translate to better power efficiency and sustained performance. The Snapdragon 855’s Kryo 485 cores are powerful, but the Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores offer a strong balance of performance and efficiency. The A3x will likely exhibit less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 107 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo A3x’s 45W wired charging with PD2.0 support allows for a 50% charge in just 30 minutes, a significant advantage over the Reno 10x Zoom’s slower 20W charging. This faster charging is crucial for modern usage patterns and mitigates any potential battery degradation in the Reno 10x Zoom’s older battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A3x if you need a reliable daily driver with fast charging, efficient performance for everyday tasks, and a modern software experience. It’s ideal for students, casual gamers, and users who prioritize battery life and quick power-ups. Buy the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom if you prefer a phone with proven flagship-level performance, even if it means sacrificing charging speed and potentially facing battery degradation due to its age. This is a good choice for power users and those who demand the best possible performance in demanding applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 855 in the Reno 10x Zoom still capable of handling demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 855 is still a capable chipset and can run Genshin Impact. However, expect potential frame drops and throttling during extended gaming sessions due to thermal limitations and the chip's age. The Dimensity 6300 in the A3x will likely provide a more consistent gaming experience due to its superior efficiency.
❓ How does the charging speed of the Oppo A3x compare to other phones in its price range?
The Oppo A3x’s 45W charging is exceptionally fast for its price range. Many competitors in the sub-$300 segment offer 18W or 25W charging, making the A3x a standout choice for users who prioritize quick power-ups. This is a significant advantage over the Reno 10x Zoom’s 20W charging.
❓ Will the older battery in the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom hold a charge as well as a new battery in the Oppo A3x?
Almost certainly not. Lithium-ion batteries degrade over time, and the Reno 10x Zoom is an older device. Expect reduced battery capacity and potentially shorter overall battery life compared to the A3x, even though both have the same endurance rating when new.
