Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ vs Oppo A3x: A Detailed Performance and Charging Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset and 120W charging significantly outperform the Oppo A3x’s Dimensity 6300 and 45W charging, justifying the potential price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A3x (China) | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, July 27 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD, 50% in 30 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, White | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | PKD130 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | About 150 EUR | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A3x (China)
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Significantly slower charging (45W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Likely lower display brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- More powerful Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset
- Brighter display (1283 nits)
- Longer battery life (10:38h active use)
- Potentially higher price
- May be less readily available depending on region
- Larger size/weight compared to the A3x (assumed)
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1283 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Oppo A3x, whose display brightness is not specified but is likely lower given its chipset tier. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s higher brightness and potential for higher refresh rates (not specified for either) contribute to a more vibrant and responsive visual experience. Bezels are assumed to be similar, typical of this price range, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s superior panel tech is the key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is likely to feature a more advanced camera system, potentially including a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms, benefiting from the increased processing power of the Dimensity 7200 Ultra. The Oppo A3x will likely offer a competent camera for everyday use, but will likely fall short in low-light performance and dynamic range compared to the Redmi Note 13 Pro+. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is also more probable on the Redmi Note 13 Pro+, further enhancing image quality.
Performance
The core performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, fabricated on a more efficient 4nm process, featuring a more powerful CPU configuration with 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 cores. This contrasts with the Oppo A3x’s Dimensity 6300 (6nm) and its 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 7200 Ultra translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The A715 cores in the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ also offer a noticeable architectural improvement over the A76 cores in the A3x, resulting in faster single-core and multi-core performance. While both phones likely feature ample RAM, the chipset difference will be the primary bottleneck for the A3x.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ excels in charging speed with its 120W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 19 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Oppo A3x’s 45W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 50%. While the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts an active use score of 10:38h, the faster charging mitigates any potential concerns about battery life. The Oppo A3x’s slower charging speed means longer periods tethered to a power outlet, a significant inconvenience for users on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A3x (China) if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for basic tasks and prioritize a potentially lower price point. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming and demanding applications, and value incredibly fast charging that minimizes downtime. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is geared towards power users.