Looking for a budget-friendly smartphone? The Oppo A35 and Samsung Galaxy A34 are popular contenders. But which one offers the best value for your money? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their features, performance, and overall experience to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 is the clear winner. While the Oppo A35 is a budget option, the A34 boasts a significantly faster processor, a brighter and higher-quality display, a better camera system, and faster charging, making it a more compelling choice overall.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 14 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 26 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4230 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | PEHM00, PEFM00 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | - | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A35
- Very affordable
- Simple user interface
- Decent battery life
- Slow performance
- Low-resolution display
- Basic camera
- Slow charging
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Fast performance
- Bright and vibrant display
- Excellent camera
- Fast charging
- Long software support
- More expensive than Oppo A35
- Design can be considered generic
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34's display is a major upgrade. Its 1009 nits max brightness provides excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, a significant advantage over the Oppo A35. The A34's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deeper blacks and richer colors, while the A35's display, though functional, lacks the vibrancy and clarity of the A34.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34's camera system is superior. While specific megapixel counts aren't the only factor, the A34's image processing and overall camera capabilities are significantly better, producing sharper, more detailed photos and videos. The A35's camera is adequate for basic snapshots but struggles in low-light conditions.
Performance
The Galaxy A34's Mediatek Dimensity 1080 chipset is considerably faster and more efficient than the Oppo A35's Helio P35. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience. Gaming performance will also be noticeably better on the A34.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life with an endurance rating of 133h. However, the Galaxy A34's 25W charging is faster than the Oppo A35's 10W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A35? Those on an extremely tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and a simple user experience. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A34? Anyone seeking a well-rounded smartphone with a good display, capable camera, solid performance, and longer software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo A35 good for gaming?
The Oppo A35's processor is not ideal for demanding games. You'll likely experience lag and low frame rates. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a much better choice for gaming.
❓ How long will Samsung support the Galaxy A34 with software updates?
Samsung typically provides 4 years of OS updates and 5 years of security updates for its Galaxy A series devices, ensuring a longer lifespan for the Galaxy A34.
