The Oppo A35 and Motorola Moto G Power (2022) represent two popular choices in the ultra-budget smartphone segment. Both aim to deliver essential functionality at a low price point, but they differ in their internal hardware. This comparison focuses on the core differences between the Mediatek Helio P35 powering the Oppo A35 and the Helio G37 in the Moto G Power, analyzing how these impact real-world performance and user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and slightly better gaming capabilities, the Motorola Moto G Power (2022) is the superior choice. While both phones share a 10W charging rate, the Helio G37 offers a modest but noticeable performance uplift over the Helio P35, making it better suited for multitasking and demanding applications.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 41, 66, 71 - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 14 | 2021, November 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 26 | Available. Released 2022, February 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 167.2 x 76.5 x 9.4 mm (6.58 x 3.01 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~79.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | - |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | - |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.65µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4230 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Black |
| Models | PEHM00, PEFM00 | - |
| Price | - | About 70 EUR |
Oppo A35
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Reliable for basic tasks
- Less powerful chipset
- Struggles with multitasking
- Limited gaming capabilities
Motorola Moto G Power (2022)
- More powerful Helio G37 chipset
- Slightly better gaming performance
- Potentially longer battery life
- May be slightly more expensive
- Still limited by 10W charging
- Software updates may be infrequent
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Motorola provide detailed display specifications for these models beyond basic resolution. However, given their price points, both likely utilize LCD panels. The focus here is on the chipset's ability to drive the display smoothly. The Helio G37's slightly more powerful GPU could translate to marginally better graphics rendering, but the difference will be minimal on these lower-resolution displays. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, typical of this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are unavailable, but both phones likely feature a primary camera alongside depth and macro sensors. Given the price point, image quality will be adequate in good lighting conditions but will suffer in low light. The Helio G37’s image signal processor (ISP) *may* offer slightly better noise reduction and dynamic range, but this is heavily dependent on software processing. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of autofocus.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A35’s Mediatek Helio P35 features an octa-core configuration with Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.35 GHz and 1.8 GHz. The Motorola Moto G Power (2022) utilizes the Helio G37, also octa-core, but with a focus on gaming. While both are built on a 12nm process, the G37’s architecture is optimized for slightly higher sustained performance. The G37’s GPU is a key differentiator, offering a modest improvement over the P35’s, which translates to smoother gameplay in less demanding titles. Both phones will struggle with graphically intensive games at higher settings.
Battery Life
Both devices are equipped with 10W wired charging, meaning charging times will be relatively slow – expect over 3 hours for a full charge. While battery capacity isn't specified in the provided data, Motorola's 'Power' branding suggests a larger battery capacity in the Moto G Power (2022) compared to the Oppo A35. The Helio G37’s improved efficiency, though marginal, could contribute to slightly longer battery life during moderate usage, offsetting any capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A35 if you primarily need a phone for basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and value simplicity. Its lower price point may be attractive for first-time smartphone users or those on a very tight budget. Buy the Motorola Moto G Power (2022) if you want a phone that can handle more than just the basics, including occasional gaming, video streaming, and multitasking, and if you prioritize a slightly smoother user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G Power (2022) handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G37 in the Moto G Power (2022) can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you'll likely need to play at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain a smooth experience. Expect frame drops during intense action sequences. The Helio P35 in the Oppo A35 will struggle even more with these titles.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge both phones from 0%?
With both phones limited to 10W charging, a full charge from 0% will take approximately 3 to 4 hours. Neither device supports fast charging technologies, so don't expect a quick top-up.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio P35 and G37 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
The difference is subtle but present. The Moto G Power (2022) with the Helio G37 will feel slightly snappier when switching between apps and loading web pages. However, for basic tasks, both phones are generally adequate.
❓ Which phone is likely to receive more software updates?
Historically, Motorola has a less consistent track record for software updates compared to Oppo. While neither phone is guaranteed frequent updates, Oppo may provide slightly better long-term software support.
