Oppo A32 vs. Xiaomi Redmi 9i Sport: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance

The Oppo A32 and Xiaomi Redmi 9i Sport represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The A32 leverages Qualcomm's Snapdragon 460, while the Redmi 9i Sport opts for MediaTek's Helio G25. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing raw processing power and potential for smoother multitasking, the Oppo A32 is the better choice thanks to its Snapdragon 460. However, the Redmi 9i Sport’s more efficient Helio G25 and potentially better battery life make it a compelling option for those focused on longevity and basic usage.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo A32 Xiaomi Redmi 9i Sport
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA-
Launch
Announced2020, September 10. Released 2020, September 102021, September 28
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2021, September 28
Body
Dimensions163.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.33 in)164.9 x 77.1 x 9 mm (6.49 x 3.04 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight186 g (6.56 oz)194 g (6.84 oz)
 -Water-repellent coating
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)
Size6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ)IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240)Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetQualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm)Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm)
GPUAdreno 610PowerVR GE8320
OSAndroid 10, ColorOS 7.2Android 10, MIUI 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM
 UFS 2.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR
Single-13 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
Triple13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS
RadioNoFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGmicroUSB 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassAccelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired10W wired
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsMint Green, Electric Black, Fancy BlueCarbon Black, Coral Green, Metallic Blue
ModelsPDVM00-
PriceAbout 150 EURAbout 100 EUR
SAR0.77 W/kg (head)     0.97 W/kg (body)-

Oppo A32

  • Faster processor for smoother multitasking
  • 18W fast charging for quicker top-ups
  • Potentially better single-core performance

  • Potentially lower battery life due to less efficient chipset
  • May run slightly warmer under sustained load

Xiaomi Redmi 9i Sport

  • More power-efficient chipset for longer battery life
  • Potentially better thermal management
  • Lower price point (likely)

  • Slower processor for demanding tasks
  • Slower 10W charging

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood: display driver efficiency. Without specific display specs, it's difficult to definitively say which is superior, but the focus should be on real-world viewing experience, which will likely be similar. Expect 720p+ resolution on both.

Camera Comparison

Both phones likely feature basic camera setups. Without detailed sensor information, it’s safe to assume both rely on a primary sensor paired with auxiliary lenses (depth, macro) of limited utility. The image processing capabilities of Qualcomm and MediaTek SoCs are generally comparable at this level. The A32’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 460 might offer slightly better noise reduction, but the real-world difference will be minimal. Focusing on the primary sensor megapixel count (if available) is more important than the presence of 2MP macro lenses.

Performance

The core battleground is the chipset. The Oppo A32’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, built on an 11nm process, features an octa-core CPU with a split core configuration (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240). This architecture aims to balance performance and power efficiency. Conversely, the Redmi 9i Sport utilizes the MediaTek Helio G25, fabricated on a more efficient 12nm process, with an octa-core CPU (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53). While the Helio G25 has a slightly higher clock speed on its prime cores, the Snapdragon 460’s Kryo cores are architecturally more advanced, suggesting better single-core performance. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother overall responsiveness on the Oppo A32.

Battery Life

The Redmi 9i Sport’s Helio G25, built on a 12nm process, inherently offers better power efficiency than the Snapdragon 460’s 11nm process. This, combined with the Redmi 9i Sport’s 10W charging, suggests a focus on maximizing battery life. The Oppo A32’s 18W charging is a clear advantage, allowing for faster top-ups, but the Snapdragon 460’s higher power draw may negate some of that benefit. Expect the Redmi 9i Sport to potentially last longer on a single charge, while the A32 will recharge more quickly.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo A32 if you frequently switch between apps, enjoy light gaming, or need a phone that feels more responsive overall. Its Snapdragon 460 provides a noticeable performance edge. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 9i Sport if your primary needs are calls, texts, social media, and occasional web browsing. The Helio G25 prioritizes efficiency, potentially leading to longer battery life between charges, and is ideal for users who don't demand high performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Redmi 9i Sport struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
The Helio G25 in the Redmi 9i Sport is capable of running essential apps like WhatsApp and Facebook without significant issues. However, expect some lag when multitasking or using more demanding features within these apps. It's designed for light to moderate usage.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Oppo A32 a significant advantage in real-world use?
Yes, the 18W charging on the Oppo A32 is a noticeable benefit. While the battery capacity is likely similar between the two devices, the faster charging will significantly reduce the time spent plugged into the wall, offering more convenience.
❓ Can either of these phones handle basic mobile gaming?
Both phones can handle basic mobile gaming, but don't expect high frame rates or graphics settings. The Oppo A32’s Snapdragon 460 will provide a slightly smoother experience for less demanding titles, while the Redmi 9i Sport may struggle with more graphically intensive games.
❓ Which phone is better for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
The Xiaomi Redmi 9i Sport is the better choice for users who primarily use their phone for calls and texts. Its power-efficient Helio G25 chipset will maximize battery life, ensuring the phone lasts throughout the day with minimal charging.