Xiaomi 14T Pro vs Oppo A3 Pro: Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset and 120W charging significantly outperform the Oppo A3 Pro’s Dimensity 6300 and 45W charging. However, the A3 Pro offers a compelling value proposition for those seeking a durable, reliable device without top-tier demands.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A3 Pro | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 21 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 21 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlit Purple, Starry Black | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | CPH2639, CPH2665 | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | ₹ 14,499 | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A3 Pro
- Potentially more durable build quality (based on brand reputation)
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Competitive price point
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Less powerful chipset compared to the 14T Pro
- Display likely lacks the brightness and advanced features of the 14T Pro
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Powerful Dimensity 9300+ chipset for demanding tasks
- Brighter and potentially more advanced display
- May be more expensive than the Oppo A3 Pro
- Potentially less durable build quality
- High performance may lead to increased heat generation
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1228 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Oppo A3 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, the 14T Pro’s brightness advantage is substantial. The 14T Pro’s panel likely benefits from a higher peak brightness and potentially a more advanced panel technology, offering a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The lack of LTPO information for the A3 Pro suggests it may not have the same adaptive refresh rate capabilities as some higher-end displays.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Oppo A3 Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, leveraging the processing power of the Dimensity 9300+ for improved image quality and computational photography. The 14T Pro’s image signal processor (ISP) will likely offer superior noise reduction, dynamic range, and detail preservation. While both phones likely include standard features like HDR and night mode, the 14T Pro’s hardware advantage suggests a more refined and versatile camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Xiaomi 14T Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) while the Oppo A3 Pro features the Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The 9300+’s Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.4 GHz, alongside its three additional Cortex-X4 cores, provides a substantial performance leap over the A3 Pro’s Cortex-A76 based CPU. The 4nm process node of the 9300+ also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a superior gaming experience on the 14T Pro. The A3 Pro’s Dimensity 6300 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14T Pro excels in charging speed, supporting 120W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. It also offers 50W wireless charging, reaching 100% in 45 minutes. The Oppo A3 Pro’s 45W wired charging, while respectable, takes considerably longer, reaching 50% in 30 minutes. The 14T Pro’s active use score of 12:32h demonstrates strong battery life despite its performance-focused chipset. While the A3 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the 14T Pro’s combination of efficient chipset and fast charging provides a significant advantage for users who demand all-day battery life and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A3 Pro if you need a phone that can withstand daily wear and tear, and prioritize a balanced experience over absolute performance. It’s ideal for everyday users, social media enthusiasts, and those who value longevity. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you’re a power user, mobile gamer, or frequently transfer large files, and demand the fastest possible charging and processing speeds. It’s geared towards those who push their phones to the limit.