Oppo A3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A55: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a consistently bright display, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the better choice. Its Exynos 1480 chipset, coupled with a measured 1010 nits peak brightness, delivers a smoother experience and better visibility in outdoor conditions, despite the A3 Pro's faster charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A3 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 21 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 21 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlit Purple, Starry Black | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | CPH2639, CPH2665 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | ₹ 14,499 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A3 Pro
- Faster 45W charging
- Potentially more durable build (based on marketing)
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 6300)
- Display brightness likely lower than A55
- Limited camera information available
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Brighter 1010 nit display
- More powerful Exynos 1480 chipset
- Excellent 13:27h battery life
- Slower 25W charging
- Potentially less durable build
- Samsung’s One UI can be resource intensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1010 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a scenario where the Oppo A3 Pro’s display specifications are currently unknown. While the A3 Pro likely offers a respectable display, the A55’s higher brightness translates to a more usable experience in direct sunlight. We anticipate the A55 utilizes a Super AMOLED panel, known for its vibrant colors and deep blacks, while the A3 Pro’s panel type remains unspecified. The A55’s display is likely to be more enjoyable for media consumption and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Oppo A3 Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung’s Galaxy A55 typically features a well-regarded main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), crucial for sharp photos and stable videos. The A55’s image processing algorithms are also refined, delivering consistent results in various lighting conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing feature, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and low resolution. The A55’s camera system is likely to provide a more versatile and reliable photography experience.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 (4nm) chipset offers a performance edge over the Oppo A3 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the Exynos 1480 is more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance under load. The A55’s CPU configuration – 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – is also more powerful than the A3 Pro’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. While both phones utilize an octa-core architecture, the A55’s core configuration and fabrication process give it a clear advantage.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 shines in battery life, achieving an impressive 13 hours and 27 minutes of active use. While the Oppo A3 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 45W wired charging offers a faster recharge rate – 50% in 30 minutes – compared to the A55’s 25W charging. However, the A55’s superior battery endurance means users may not need to rely on fast charging as frequently. The A55’s efficiency, stemming from the 4nm Exynos 1480, contributes significantly to its extended battery life, making it ideal for users who prioritize all-day usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A3 Pro if you need a phone that can withstand drops and prioritize quick top-ups with its 45W charging. This phone is ideal for users who are accident-prone or frequently on the move. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a phone with exceptional battery life, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a slightly more powerful processor for demanding tasks. This is the better option for media consumption and moderate gaming.