OnePlus 12R vs Oppo A3 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 12R emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers significantly superior performance, and its 100W charging is a game-changer. While the A3 Pro offers a unique design, the 12R’s raw power and faster charging provide a more compelling overall experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A3 Pro | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 21 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 21 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlit Purple, Starry Black | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | CPH2639, CPH2665 | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | ₹ 14,499 | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A3 Pro
- Potentially more durable build quality (based on Oppo’s reputation)
- Efficient processor for everyday tasks
- Unique design aesthetic
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Limited information on display quality
OnePlus 12R
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Bright and vibrant display (1181 nits)
- May run warmer under sustained load
- Potentially less durable build compared to the A3 Pro
- Software experience may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 12R boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1181 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo A3 Pro. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the 12R’s brightness advantage is a clear win. Details regarding the A3 Pro’s panel technology (LTPO, PWM dimming rate) are currently unavailable, making a complete assessment difficult, but the 12R’s brightness is a known quantity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Oppo A3 Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, the OnePlus 12R is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system, leveraging the image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The 12R’s camera system will likely prioritize detail and dynamic range. The A3 Pro’s camera performance will likely be adequate for casual photography, but it’s unlikely to match the 12R’s capabilities in challenging lighting conditions or for advanced photography techniques.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The OnePlus 12R’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) features a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz (Cortex-X3), alongside high-performance Cortex-A715 and A710 cores, offering a significant leap in CPU and GPU power over the Oppo A3 Pro’s Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The Dimensity 6300, with its Cortex-A76 and A55 cores, is geared towards efficiency rather than outright speed. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The 12R will handle demanding games and applications with ease, while the A3 Pro may struggle with more intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R’s 100W wired charging is a standout feature, capable of fully charging the device in just 26 minutes. The Oppo A3 Pro’s 45W charging, while respectable, takes considerably longer, reaching 50% in 30 minutes. While the 12R’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 14:32h demonstrates excellent battery life. The A3 Pro’s battery capacity is also unknown, but the slower charging speed suggests a trade-off between battery size and charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A3 Pro if you prioritize a robust build quality and are comfortable with a more modest performance profile for everyday tasks. It’s ideal for users who value durability and aren’t heavy gamers or power users. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you demand flagship-level performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications, and if rapid charging is a must-have feature. It’s the better choice for tech enthusiasts and those who want a phone that can keep up with their fast-paced lives.