Oppo A3 Pro vs Motorola Edge 50 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a brighter display, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is the clear winner. Its 125W charging and 1295 nit peak brightness offer a tangible advantage. However, the Oppo A3 Pro’s robust build quality and potentially more efficient chipset make it a strong contender for those valuing longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A3 Pro | Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 21 | 2024, April 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 21 | Available. Released 2024, April 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 161.2 x 72.4 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~92.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 720 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.4, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.0, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 21mm (wide), 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 125W wired, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlit Purple, Starry Black | Luxe Lavender, Black Beauty, Moonlight Pearl, Vanilla Cream |
| Models | CPH2639, CPH2665 | XT2403-2 |
| Price | ₹ 14,499 | € 410.57 / $ 399.00 / £ 369.99 / ₹ 22,995 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A3 Pro
- Potentially more durable build quality
- Balanced feature set for everyday use
- Potentially more efficient chipset (6nm)
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Less powerful processor compared to Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
- Incredibly fast 125W wired charging
- Brighter display (1295 nits)
- More powerful Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- May require more frequent charging due to higher performance
- Build quality may not be as robust as the A3 Pro
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1295 nits, compared to an unstated peak brightness for the Oppo A3 Pro. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the A3 Pro’s panel technology isn’t specified, the Edge 50 Pro’s brightness advantage is substantial. The Edge 50 Pro’s display is likely to offer a more immersive viewing experience, especially for HDR content. Bezels are assumed to be comparable given the market segment, but the brightness difference is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Oppo A3 Pro, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, leveraging Qualcomm’s ISP capabilities within the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. The Edge 50 Pro likely benefits from improved image processing algorithms and potentially better low-light performance. Focusing on the main sensor size and aperture would be crucial for a more detailed analysis, but the chipset advantage leans towards the Motorola.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) chipset represents a clear architectural advantage over the Oppo A3 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The 4nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The Edge 50 Pro’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 prime core alongside 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 performance cores and 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 efficiency cores – is more sophisticated than the A3 Pro’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the Motorola.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro’s charging capabilities are a standout feature, offering 125W wired charging, achieving 100% charge in just 18 minutes. This is dramatically faster than the Oppo A3 Pro’s 45W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Edge 50 Pro also includes 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the A3 Pro. While the A3 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Edge 50 Pro’s active use score of 11:59h demonstrates strong battery life despite the faster charging, suggesting efficient power management.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A3 Pro if you need a phone that can withstand daily wear and tear, and prioritize a balanced feature set over outright speed. It’s ideal for users who aren’t constantly pushing their phone to its limits. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Pro if you prefer a vibrant display, incredibly fast charging, and a more powerful processor for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. This phone caters to power users who demand responsiveness.