Oppo A3 Pro vs Honor X9b: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term efficiency and potentially smoother multitasking, the Honor X9b emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, built on a 4nm process, offers a tangible advantage in power efficiency and sustained performance over the Oppo A3 Pro’s Dimensity 6300. However, the A3 Pro’s 45W charging is a notable benefit.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A3 Pro | Honor X9b |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 21 | 2023, October 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 21 | Available. Released 2023, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, Magic OS 7.2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 35W wired Reverse wired |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlit Purple, Starry Black | Sunrise Orange, Midnight Black, Emerald Green |
| Models | CPH2639, CPH2665 | ALI-NX1 |
| Price | ₹ 14,499 | About 970 EUR |
Oppo A3 Pro
- Faster 45W wired charging
- Potentially more durable build quality
- Proven Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Less power-efficient 6nm chipset
- Older CPU architecture
- Likely less smooth multitasking
Honor X9b
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
- Modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A78)
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower 35W wired charging
- Potentially less durable build
- May require more frequent software updates for optimization
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Honor provided display specs. Given the price bracket, we can assume both utilize LCD panels, likely FHD+ resolution. The key differentiator will likely be peak brightness and color accuracy. However, without specific data, it's difficult to definitively state which offers a superior visual experience. The A3 Pro's marketing emphasizes durability, suggesting a potentially more robust display construction.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will depend heavily on sensor size, lens aperture, and image processing algorithms. We can anticipate both will include a primary sensor, an ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. Given the market segment, image processing will likely prioritize social media-friendly results over absolute accuracy. The absence of OIS information suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography without significant software intervention.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X9b’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) boasts a more modern architecture than the Oppo A3 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). While clock speeds aren’t the whole story – the A3 Pro has 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores versus the X9b’s 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – the 4nm process node gives the Snapdragon a significant edge in power efficiency. This translates to less heat generation under sustained load and potentially longer battery life. The X9b’s Cortex-A78 cores are also architecturally superior to the A76 cores in the A3 Pro, offering better single-core performance. The X9b is likely to handle multitasking and demanding apps more smoothly.
Battery Life
The Oppo A3 Pro’s 45W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Honor X9b’s 35W charging. This means the A3 Pro can replenish its battery significantly faster, reaching 50% charge in just 30 minutes. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1’s superior efficiency in the X9b could offset a potentially smaller battery size, resulting in comparable real-world battery life. The X9b also offers reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A3 Pro if you prioritize a phone that feels exceptionally durable and are comfortable with a slightly less power-efficient chipset. Its 45W charging will get you back up and running quickly. Buy the Honor X9b if you value long-term battery life, smoother multitasking, and a more modern processor architecture, even if it means slightly slower wired charging. It’s the better choice for users who frequently switch between apps or engage in moderate gaming.