Oppo A3 Pro vs Google Pixel 8a: A Detailed Comparison for Smart Buyers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 8a is the stronger choice. Its Tensor G3 chip and exceptional image processing deliver superior photos and a smoother, more intelligent user interface. However, the Oppo A3 Pro’s faster charging and potentially more durable build are significant advantages for specific users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A3 Pro | Google Pixel 8a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - G6GPR (International) |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G6GPR (International) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 21 | 2024, May 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 21 | Available. Released 2024, May 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 152.1 x 72.7 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~430 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | OLED, HDR, 120Hz, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP (16 MP eff.), f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR, panorama, Best Take |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent) |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 30 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Po 4492 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlit Purple, Starry Black | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Aloe |
| Models | CPH2639, CPH2665 | GKV4X, G6GPR, G8HHN, G576D |
| Price | ₹ 14,499 | $ 229.98 / C$ 417.99 / £ 279.00 / € 299.99 / ₹ 33,300 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 40:06h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Oppo A3 Pro
- Faster 45W wired charging
- Potentially more durable build quality
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful chipset compared to Tensor G3
- Limited battery life information
- Camera performance likely lags behind Pixel 8a
Google Pixel 8a
- Superior camera quality and image processing
- Excellent battery life and endurance
- Powerful Google Tensor G3 chip
- Slower 18W wired charging
- Higher price compared to Oppo A3 Pro
- May lack the same level of physical durability
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 8a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1508 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Oppo A3 Pro (brightness data unavailable). While the A3 Pro’s display specs are not provided, the Pixel 8a’s OLED panel offers vibrant colors and excellent contrast. The Pixel 8a’s display technology likely incorporates features like HDR support, enhancing video playback, a feature not confirmed for the A3 Pro. The Pixel 8a’s display is a clear advantage for outdoor visibility and media consumption.
Camera Comparison
While detailed camera specs for the Oppo A3 Pro are missing, the Google Pixel 8a’s strength lies in its computational photography capabilities. Google’s image processing algorithms excel at dynamic range, noise reduction, and detail preservation, even in challenging lighting conditions. The Pixel 8a’s software features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur further enhance the user experience. Without knowing the Oppo A3 Pro’s sensor size or aperture, it’s difficult to directly compare image quality, but the Pixel 8a’s reputation for consistently excellent camera performance gives it a significant advantage. The A3 Pro’s camera system is likely geared towards general-purpose photography, while the Pixel 8a offers a more refined and feature-rich experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo A3 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), while the Pixel 8a is powered by Google’s Tensor G3 (4nm). The Tensor G3’s 4nm process offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the Dimensity 6300’s 6nm node, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The Tensor G3’s nona-core architecture, featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core, provides a performance edge in demanding tasks like video editing and gaming, exceeding the octa-core Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores. The Pixel 8a’s focus on AI and machine learning tasks is also better supported by the Tensor G3.
Battery Life
The Google Pixel 8a demonstrates exceptional battery endurance, achieving a measured 40:06h endurance rating and 11:25h of active use. This is a substantial advantage over the Oppo A3 Pro, for which battery life data is unavailable. While the A3 Pro offers faster 45W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes), the Pixel 8a’s 18W charging, coupled with its larger battery capacity and efficient Tensor G3 chip, provides a more balanced and long-lasting experience. The Pixel 8a also supports 7.5W wireless charging and bypass charging, offering added convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A3 Pro if you need a phone that can withstand daily wear and tear, and prioritize rapid 45W charging for minimal downtime. It’s ideal for users who frequently drop their phones or are always on the go. Buy the Google Pixel 8a if you value computational photography, a clean Android experience with guaranteed updates, and long-term battery health thanks to its impressive endurance rating and optimized power management.