The Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro and Oppo A3 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive Chinese smartphone market. While both aim for a flagship experience, they diverge significantly in their core components, particularly the chipset and charging technology. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and blazing-fast charging, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset delivers a substantial performance leap over the Oppo A3 Pro’s Dimensity 7050, making it ideal for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the A3 Pro offers a compelling alternative for those seeking a more balanced experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 12 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 19 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 74.3 x 7.5 mm or 7.9 mm | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g or 182 g (6.24 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom
12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 56% in 20 min
Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Pink, Mint | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Models | PJY110 | 23117RK66C |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 430 EUR |
Oppo A3 Pro (China)
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Durable build quality (implied by brand reputation)
- Efficient power consumption
- Less powerful chipset compared to the K70 Pro
- Slower charging speed
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
- Exceptional performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Likely superior camera capabilities
- Potential for higher thermal output under load
- May consume battery faster during intensive use
Display Comparison
While display specifications are not provided, both devices likely feature AMOLED panels given their market segment. However, the Redmi K70 Pro, being positioned as a higher-end device, is expected to boast a higher peak brightness and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, leading to improved power efficiency. The Oppo A3 Pro will likely focus on color accuracy and viewing angles, but may not reach the same peak luminance as the K70 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, it's difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, given the Redmi K70 Pro’s flagship positioning, it’s reasonable to expect a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS) compared to the Oppo A3 Pro. The K70 Pro likely employs more sophisticated image processing algorithms, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Oppo A3 Pro will likely focus on providing a consistent and reliable camera experience, but may not match the K70 Pro’s capabilities in challenging conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Oppo A3 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 utilizes a more advanced 4nm process, resulting in improved power efficiency and thermal performance. Its CPU configuration – a 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core alongside 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 cores – provides a substantial performance advantage over the Dimensity 7050’s 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the K70 Pro. The K70 Pro also benefits from a newer generation GPU, further widening the performance gap.
Battery Life
The Redmi K70 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 18 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Oppo A3 Pro’s 67W charging, which takes approximately 20 minutes to reach 56%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the K70 Pro effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The K70 Pro also supports PD3.0 and QC3+ standards, offering wider compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A3 Pro (China) if you need a durable device with reliable performance for everyday tasks and appreciate a more conservative approach to power consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro if you prioritize top-tier gaming performance, rapid charging speeds, and are willing to accept potentially higher thermal output under sustained load. The K70 Pro is for the power user, while the A3 Pro is for the practical user.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the Redmi K70 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is a powerful chip, it can generate significant heat under sustained load. Xiaomi typically employs advanced cooling solutions, such as vapor chambers, to mitigate thermal throttling. However, users should expect some degree of heat buildup during extended gaming sessions, potentially leading to slight performance dips.
❓ Does the Oppo A3 Pro support global ROMs and updates?
The Oppo A3 Pro is initially a China-exclusive device. While unofficial ROMs may become available, official global ROM support and updates are not guaranteed. Users should be aware of the potential challenges associated with using a China-exclusive device outside of China, including language barriers and limited software support.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Oppo A3 Pro compare to other phones in its price range?
67W charging is respectable, but slower than the 80W or 120W charging found on some competing devices. It's still significantly faster than standard 25W or 33W charging, but users accustomed to ultra-fast charging may find it less convenient than the Redmi K70 Pro's 120W solution.
