The Oppo A3 Pro and OnePlus Ace 3V represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this goal, primarily through chipset choice and charging technology. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Ace 3V emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and superior thermal management compared to the Oppo A3 Pro’s Dimensity 7050. The faster 100W charging further solidifies its position.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 12 | 2024, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 19 | Available. Released 2024, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 74.3 x 7.5 mm or 7.9 mm | 162.7 x 75.2 x 8.5 mm (6.41 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g or 182 g (6.24 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1100 nits (HBM), 2150 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7675 Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 732 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 56% in 20 min
Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Pink, Mint | Purple, Gray |
| Models | PJY110 | PJF110 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Oppo A3 Pro (China)
- Potentially more durable build quality (Oppo's reputation)
- May offer a more refined software experience (depending on ColorOS version)
- 67W charging is still relatively fast
- Less powerful Dimensity 7050 chipset
- 6nm process less efficient than 4nm
- Slower charging compared to Ace 3V
OnePlus Ace 3V
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset
- 4nm process for improved efficiency and thermals
- Blazing-fast 100W charging
- OnePlus software can be polarizing
- May require importing (China exclusive)
- Potential for more aggressive thermal throttling under extreme load (though less likely than A3 Pro)
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor OnePlus provide display specs beyond resolution in their marketing materials. However, given the price points, both likely utilize AMOLED panels. The key difference lies in the underlying processing power needed to drive them efficiently. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3’s ISP and display engine are more advanced, potentially leading to better color accuracy and smoother scrolling. The lack of LTPO support on either device suggests refresh rates are likely fixed, impacting battery life during static content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, both phones likely feature similar sensor configurations targeting the mid-range segment. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3’s superior image signal processor (ISP) will likely provide better image processing capabilities, resulting in improved dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Oppo A3 Pro may lean towards a more saturated color profile, typical of Oppo’s image processing, while the Ace 3V might aim for a more natural look.
Performance
The core differentiator here is the chipset. The OnePlus Ace 3V’s Qualcomm SM7675 Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4nm) boasts a significantly more modern architecture than the Oppo A3 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The Snapdragon’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 2.8 GHz, offers a substantial performance uplift over the Dimensity’s Cortex-A78 cores at 2.6 GHz. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon also translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads, making it the superior choice for demanding games and applications. The Ace 3V’s CPU configuration (1+4+3) is also more balanced for multi-tasking.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Ace 3V’s 100W charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 26 minutes. This significantly outperforms the Oppo A3 Pro’s 67W charging, which takes approximately 20 minutes to reach 56%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3’s superior efficiency means the Ace 3V will likely deliver comparable or even better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity. The faster charging speed is a significant convenience factor for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A3 Pro (China) if you prioritize robust build quality and a slightly more conservative software experience, and are comfortable with the Dimensity 7050's performance profile. Buy the OnePlus Ace 3V if you demand maximum performance for gaming and multitasking, value incredibly fast charging, and appreciate a more modern chipset architecture. The Ace 3V is the clear choice for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 in the OnePlus Ace 3V handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 is well-equipped to handle Genshin Impact and other graphically intensive games at high settings. Its Adreno GPU and efficient thermal design will provide a smooth and consistent gaming experience, minimizing frame drops and throttling.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Oppo A3 Pro slow compared to the competition?
While 67W is still considered fast charging, it's noticeably slower than the 100W charging on the OnePlus Ace 3V. Expect a full charge to take around an hour, whereas the Ace 3V can achieve a full charge in approximately 26 minutes. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Are there any known overheating issues with the Dimensity 7050 in the Oppo A3 Pro during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7050, being built on a 6nm process, is more prone to thermal throttling than the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3’s 4nm process. While not necessarily overheating to a dangerous degree, users may experience reduced performance and frame rates during extended gaming sessions as the phone attempts to manage heat.
❓ Both phones are China-exclusive. What are the potential drawbacks of importing one?
Importing either phone may result in software limitations (language options, lack of Google services), warranty issues, and potential compatibility problems with local cellular networks. You'll also need to ensure the charger is compatible with your region's power standards.
