Oppo A3 4G vs OnePlus Nord N10 5G: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Buyers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and occasional 5G access, the OnePlus Nord N10 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 690 offers a performance edge and 5G capability. However, the Oppo A3 4G’s 45W charging is a significant advantage for those who value rapid top-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A3 4G | OnePlus Nord N10 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - version 1 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - version 1 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 28, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1024/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 20 | 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 20 | Available. Released 2020, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 163 x 74.7 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.49 inches, 101.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM-6115 Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen1 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619L |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.1 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD2.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min | 30W wired |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sparkle Black, Starry Purple, Starlight White | Midnight Ice |
| Models | CPH2669, CPH3669 | BE2029, BE2025, BE2026, BE2028 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 279579 (v8) GeekBench: 1848 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A3 4G
- 45W Fast Charging with PD/PPS
- More recent Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management due to newer chipset
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Display specifications are unknown
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Larger Display (implied)
- Snapdragon 690 offers better sustained performance
- Slower 30W Charging
- Older chipset generation
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord N10 5G boasts a larger display, though specific size isn't provided, while the Oppo A3 4G’s display details are missing. The Nord N10 5G’s measured 440 nits of brightness is adequate for indoor use, but may struggle in direct sunlight. Its 1447:1 contrast ratio suggests decent black levels. Without display specs for the A3 4G, it’s difficult to directly compare, but the Nord N10 5G’s larger size offers a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specs are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the market positioning, it’s likely both phones rely on similar-tier sensors. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout performer in the camera department, focusing instead on providing adequate image capture for social media and casual use. We can assume both will include a standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens, though the quality of the macro lens is likely limited.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord N10 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G (8nm), featuring a Kryo 560 CPU configuration with 2x2.0 GHz Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Silver cores. This 8nm process offers improved efficiency compared to the Oppo A3 4G’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 (11nm). The A3 4G’s CPU consists of 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. While clock speeds appear higher on the A3 4G, the Snapdragon 690’s architecture and smaller node size generally translate to better sustained performance and power efficiency, particularly in graphically intensive tasks. The 5G modem in the Nord N10 5G is a key differentiator.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo A3 4G supports 45W wired charging with PD2.0 and PPS, promising a 50% charge in just 30 minutes. The OnePlus Nord N10 5G is limited to 30W charging. This means the A3 4G will significantly reduce downtime for users who prioritize quick charging, even if the overall battery endurance is similar.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A3 4G if you need exceptionally fast charging and don't require 5G connectivity. Its 45W charging and newer Snapdragon 6s Gen 1 make it ideal for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery. Buy the OnePlus Nord N10 5G if you prefer 5G connectivity, a larger display, and a slightly more powerful processor for handling demanding apps and games, even if it means slower charging.