The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Oppo A2x, powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 6020, aims to deliver solid performance at an accessible price. However, it faces stiff competition from the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G, which leverages the Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G. This comparison dives deep into the core differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a generally smoother experience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G emerges as the winner. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the Oppo A2x’s 10W, and the Snapdragon 732G, while older, offers a refined experience in everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 12 | 2023, March 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 16 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 201.8 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 720 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, 700 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Purple | Star Blue, Graphite Gray, Polar White, Ice blue |
| Models | PJU110, PJS110 | 2209116AG, 2209116AG |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 150 EUR |
Oppo A2x
- Newer chipset architecture (Dimensity 6020)
- Potentially more efficient 7nm process
- May support faster RAM (LPDDR5)
- Significantly slower 10W charging
- Less refined software optimization compared to Snapdragon
- Uncertain camera performance
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G
- Blazing-fast 67W wired charging
- Mature Snapdragon 732G chipset with optimized software
- Likely better camera image processing
- Older 8nm process node
- Potentially slower RAM (LPDDR4X)
- Chipset is a generation behind
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are absent, the focus here is on the core processing power. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of high refresh rates on either device suggests a focus on power efficiency rather than visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor and supporting lenses. The Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G, given Xiaomi’s history, likely prioritizes higher megapixel counts, potentially offering more detail in well-lit conditions. Image processing will be a key differentiator, with Xiaomi typically leaning towards more vibrant, saturated colors, while Oppo often aims for a more natural look. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for low-light photography.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Oppo A2x’s Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7nm) utilizes a more modern architecture with Cortex-A76 cores, offering a theoretical advantage in single-core performance compared to the Xiaomi’s Snapdragon 732G (8nm). However, the Snapdragon 732G benefits from Qualcomm’s software optimization and a mature driver ecosystem. The 8nm process node of the Snapdragon 732G, while larger than the Dimensity 6020’s 7nm, doesn’t necessarily translate to worse performance; Qualcomm’s efficiency gains often compensate. The Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G’s likely use of LPDDR4X RAM, versus potentially LPDDR5 on the A2x, could slightly offset the Snapdragon’s advantages, but the real-world impact will be minimal for most users.
Battery Life
This is where the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G truly shines. Its 67W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in under an hour. The Oppo A2x’s 10W charging is comparatively glacial, requiring several hours to reach 100%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery size. Users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day will greatly appreciate the Redmi’s speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A2x if you prioritize a newer chipset architecture and are willing to sacrifice charging speed and potentially some performance smoothness. It’s a good choice for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G if you value rapid charging, a more established chipset with optimized software, and a generally more responsive user experience, even if it means opting for a slightly older processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 732G still a capable processor in 2024?
Absolutely. While not the latest and greatest, the Snapdragon 732G remains a very capable processor for everyday tasks, social media, and even moderate gaming. Qualcomm’s software optimization ensures a smooth and responsive experience, even compared to newer, less-optimized chipsets.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G compared to the Oppo A2x’s 10W charging?
The difference is substantial. The Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G can go from 0-100% in approximately 45-60 minutes, while the Oppo A2x will likely take 3-4 hours. This means you can quickly top up your Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G during a short break, something that’s impractical with the A2x’s slow charging.
❓ Will I notice a significant difference in gaming performance between these two phones?
For casual gaming, the difference will be minimal. However, for more demanding titles, the Snapdragon 732G in the Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G may offer slightly more consistent frame rates due to its optimized thermal management and driver support. The Dimensity 6020’s newer architecture *could* offer a theoretical advantage, but real-world performance will depend on software optimization.
