The Oppo A2x and Xiaomi Civi 3 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both devices target budget-conscious consumers, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their chipset and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Civi 3 is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 8200 Ultra chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Oppo A2x’s Dimensity 6020, and the 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime. While the A2x offers a more affordable entry point, the Civi 3’s enhanced capabilities justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 12 | 2023, May 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 16 | Available. Released 2023, May 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 158.7 x 71.7 x 7.6 mm (6.25 x 2.82 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 174 g (6.14 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 720 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Quad-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF
32 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Features | Panorama | 2 Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 38 minutes |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Purple | Purple, Mint, Gold, Gray |
| Models | PJU110, PJS110 | 23046PNC9C |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 330 EUR |
Oppo A2x
- Most affordable option
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Reliable Mediatek chipset
- Extremely slow 10W charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to Civi 3
- Likely inferior camera performance
Xiaomi Civi 3
- Significantly faster Dimensity 8200 Ultra processor
- 67W fast charging with PD3.0
- Likely superior camera system
- Higher price point
- May not be ideal for extremely budget-conscious buyers
- No specified battery capacity
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Civi 3’s positioning as a more premium device, it likely features a higher-quality panel with potentially better color accuracy and peak brightness. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests standard refresh rate panels, impacting power efficiency during dynamic content viewing. Bezels are likely comparable, given the market segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the Civi 3’s higher overall price point suggests a more sophisticated camera system. It’s reasonable to assume the Civi 3 features a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The A2x likely relies on software processing to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Civi 3’s Dimensity 8200 Ultra, fabricated on a 4nm process, represents a significant leap in performance and efficiency over the Oppo A2x’s Dimensity 6020 (7nm). The 8200 Ultra’s CPU configuration – 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – is demonstrably more powerful than the A2x’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The 4nm process also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling under sustained load. The Civi 3 will handle graphically intensive games at higher settings with greater stability.
Battery Life
The Oppo A2x is limited to 10W wired charging, a significant drawback in today’s market. This slow charging speed will require several hours to fully replenish the battery. The Xiaomi Civi 3, with its 67W wired charging and PD3.0 support, can reach 100% charge in a claimed 38 minutes. This dramatically reduces downtime and offers a much more convenient charging experience. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Civi 3’s faster charging effectively mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A2x if you prioritize extreme affordability and basic smartphone functionality – calls, texts, and light social media use. It’s a solid option for first-time smartphone users or those on a very tight budget. Buy the Xiaomi Civi 3 if you value performance for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and if you want the convenience of significantly faster charging. It’s ideal for users who demand a smoother, more responsive experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much of a performance difference can I expect between the Dimensity 8200 Ultra and the Dimensity 6020 in real-world usage?
The Dimensity 8200 Ultra offers a substantial performance increase – roughly 40-60% in CPU and GPU benchmarks. This translates to noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a significantly better gaming experience, especially with demanding titles. The A2x will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Civi 3 provides headroom for more intensive applications.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Xiaomi Civi 3 truly as fast as advertised, and will it impact battery health over time?
67W charging is indeed very fast, typically delivering a full charge in around 38 minutes as Xiaomi claims. While fast charging can theoretically accelerate battery degradation over the long term, modern smartphones employ sophisticated charging management systems to mitigate this effect. The Civi 3’s PD3.0 support also ensures optimized charging profiles for battery longevity.
❓ Given the lack of detailed camera specs, should I assume the Oppo A2x's camera is significantly worse than the Xiaomi Civi 3's?
It's a reasonable assumption. The Civi 3's positioning as a more premium device strongly suggests a more capable camera system, likely featuring a larger sensor, better image processing, and potentially optical image stabilization. While the A2x can likely capture acceptable photos in good lighting conditions, the Civi 3 will likely excel in low-light scenarios and offer greater detail.
