The Oppo A2x and OnePlus Ace 2V both target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, but they approach it from vastly different angles. The A2x prioritizes affordability, while the Ace 2V aims for a near-flagship experience without the flagship price tag. This comparison dissects their core components to reveal which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and fast charging, the OnePlus Ace 2V is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9000 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the Oppo A2x’s Dimensity 6020 and 10W charging. The A2x remains a viable option for those on a very tight budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 12 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 16 | Available. Released 2023, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 162.6 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 191.5 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 720 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Purple | Black, Blue/Green |
| Models | PJU110, PJS110 | PHP110 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 310 EUR |
Oppo A2x
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life (depending on capacity)
- Simple and functional user experience
- Significantly slower performance
- Extremely slow 10W charging
- Likely lower quality display
OnePlus Ace 2V
- Much faster Dimensity 9000 chipset
- 80W SuperVOOC charging (32 min 0-100%)
- Likely superior display quality
- Higher price than the Oppo A2x
- Potentially shorter battery life (depending on capacity)
- May run more demanding apps
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Ace 2V's positioning, it likely features a higher quality panel with a faster refresh rate. The A2x, aiming for cost savings, likely utilizes a standard 60Hz LCD. Bezels are expected to be larger on the A2x to further reduce production costs. Color accuracy will likely be superior on the Ace 2V, benefiting from a more advanced display calibration process.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, the Ace 2V, positioned as a more premium device, likely features a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS) for improved low-light performance and sharper images. The A2x likely utilizes a smaller sensor without OIS. Lens apertures are also expected to be wider on the Ace 2V, further enhancing low-light capabilities. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit to most users.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The OnePlus Ace 2V’s Dimensity 9000, fabricated on a 4nm process, boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.05 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 performance cores and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. This configuration delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the Oppo A2x’s Dimensity 6020. The 6020, built on a 7nm node, uses older Cortex-A76 and A55 cores. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 9000 also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. Users who play demanding games or frequently multitask will experience a dramatically smoother experience on the Ace 2V.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the charging speed difference is a major differentiator. The OnePlus Ace 2V’s 80W wired charging can replenish the battery to 100% in just 32 minutes, offering a significantly faster top-up compared to the Oppo A2x’s slow 10W charging. While the A2x might have a slightly larger battery capacity, the Ace 2V’s rapid charging mitigates any potential disadvantage, providing more convenient and flexible usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A2x if you need a basic, functional smartphone for everyday tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the OnePlus Ace 2V if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and you value significantly faster charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 6020 in the Oppo A2x sufficient for playing games like Call of Duty Mobile?
While the Dimensity 6020 can run Call of Duty Mobile, you'll likely need to lower graphics settings and accept lower frame rates for a smooth experience. The Ace 2V’s Dimensity 9000 will provide a significantly more fluid and visually appealing gaming experience at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the OnePlus Ace 2V compared to the 10W charging on the Oppo A2x in real-world use?
The difference is dramatic. The Ace 2V can fully charge in approximately 32 minutes, while the A2x will take several hours to reach 100%. This means you can quickly top up the Ace 2V during short breaks, whereas the A2x requires overnight charging for a full battery.
❓ Will the Oppo A2x struggle with multitasking or running multiple apps simultaneously?
Yes, the Dimensity 6020 and its older core architecture will likely exhibit slowdowns when multitasking with numerous apps. The Ace 2V’s Dimensity 9000, with its more powerful cores and ample RAM, handles multitasking with ease.
