The Oppo A2x and Honor X50 GT represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The A2x focuses on providing a functional experience at an accessible price, while the X50 GT aims to deliver near-flagship performance without the flagship price tag. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on the impact of their contrasting chipsets and charging capabilities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Honor X50 GT is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a substantial leap in processing power. However, budget-conscious users seeking a reliable daily driver will find the Oppo A2x a capable and affordable option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 12 | 2024, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 16 | Available. Released 2024, January 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8.1 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 720 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, ultrasound proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 35W wired
7.5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Purple | Black, Silver |
| Models | PJU110, PJS110 | ALP-AN00 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Oppo A2x
- More affordable price point
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Potentially longer software support (Oppo's track record)
- Significantly slower performance
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely less capable camera system
Honor X50 GT
- Exceptional performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Fast 35W wired charging
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Higher price compared to Oppo A2x
- Potential for more heat generation under heavy load
- Honor's software update history is less consistent than Oppo's
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the X50 GT's positioning, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel (potentially 120Hz or 144Hz) compared to the A2x, which may be capped at 60Hz. The X50 GT is also more likely to have a higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. Bezels are expected to be similar, reflecting the mid-range nature of both devices. Color accuracy will depend on panel calibration, a detail not available in the provided data.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, the X50 GT, being positioned as a gaming-focused device, is likely to have a more sophisticated camera system. While both phones may include multiple lenses, the X50 GT likely benefits from a larger primary sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The image processing algorithms employed by Qualcomm’s ISP are also generally more advanced than those found in MediaTek-powered devices. The A2x will likely offer acceptable image quality for casual use, but the X50 GT should deliver a more refined photographic experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X50 GT’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Oppo A2x’s MediaTek Dimensity 6020 (7nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside Cortex-A710 performance cores, offering substantially higher single-core and multi-core performance. The Dimensity 6020, while capable, relies on older Cortex-A76 cores. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 also provides superior thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. The X50 GT will demonstrably outperform the A2x in graphically intensive tasks and multitasking.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Honor X50 GT’s 35W wired charging is a major advantage over the Oppo A2x’s 10W charging. This translates to significantly faster charging times – potentially a full charge in under an hour for the X50 GT versus several hours for the A2x. The X50 GT also includes 7.5W reverse wired charging, allowing it to top up other devices, a feature absent on the A2x. Even if the A2x has a slightly larger battery, the X50 GT’s faster charging mitigates any potential endurance disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A2x if you need a dependable smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption, and prioritize affordability above all else. Buy the Honor X50 GT if you prefer a smoother experience with demanding games, faster app loading times, and quicker charging, and are willing to spend a bit more for that performance boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor X50 GT overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, its 4nm process node and Honor's cooling solutions (likely a combination of heat pipe and graphite sheets) should mitigate overheating. However, some throttling is possible during extremely demanding games over extended periods. The A2x's Dimensity 6020 will likely exhibit less throttling due to its lower power draw, but at the cost of overall performance.
❓ Is the 7.5W reverse wired charging on the Honor X50 GT useful for topping up accessories like earbuds?
Yes, the 7.5W reverse wired charging is a convenient feature for topping up accessories like wireless earbuds or smartwatches. While not as fast as dedicated chargers, it provides a lifeline when you're away from a power outlet. The Oppo A2x lacks this functionality entirely.
❓ How much faster is the charging speed of the Honor X50 GT compared to the Oppo A2x?
The Honor X50 GT's 35W charging is dramatically faster than the Oppo A2x's 10W charging. Expect the X50 GT to go from 0-100% in approximately 60-90 minutes, while the A2x could take 3-5 hours or more for a full charge. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
