The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo A2 and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both leverage MediaTek's Dimensity series, they target slightly different priorities: the A2 focuses on affordability, while the X6 Pro aims for near-flagship performance. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset, coupled with 67W fast charging and a brighter display, justifies the price premium. However, the Oppo A2 remains a viable option for those prioritizing extreme budget constraints and basic smartphone functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 03 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 06 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 51% in 30 min | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mystery Black, Glowing Green, Violet | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | PJB110 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A2
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Reliable for everyday use
- Significantly weaker chipset compared to the X6 Pro
- Slower charging speed
- Likely lower display quality
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Faster 67W charging
- Brighter and higher-quality display
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potentially larger and heavier design
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the Oppo A2 (brightness data unavailable, but expected to be lower based on market positioning). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the X6 Pro’s higher peak brightness and potentially better color calibration (based on Xiaomi’s display track record) provide a superior viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching to conserve battery, but the X6 Pro’s superior panel quality will be more noticeable.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the available data focuses on overall capability rather than specific sensor details. The Poco X6 Pro, positioned as a performance-focused device, is expected to have a more capable primary camera with features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) to improve low-light photography and video stabilization. The Oppo A2’s camera system will likely prioritize cost-effectiveness, potentially resulting in lower image quality and fewer features. We anticipate the X6 Pro will excel in both photo and video capture, offering greater detail and dynamic range.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a powerhouse, featuring a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core and 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 cores, alongside 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 cores. This contrasts sharply with the Oppo A2’s Dimensity 6020 (7nm), which uses older Cortex-A76 and A55 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 2.0 GHz respectively. The 4nm process node of the X6 Pro’s chipset translates to improved thermal efficiency and sustained performance under load, crucial for gaming and multitasking. The X6 Pro will deliver significantly faster app launch times, smoother animations, and a far more responsive gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 11:46h. While the Oppo A2’s battery capacity is not specified, the X6 Pro’s longer runtime suggests a combination of efficient chipset design and optimized software. Furthermore, the X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support allows for a full charge in just 45 minutes, significantly faster than the Oppo A2’s 33W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 51%. This faster charging is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A2 if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and are willing to compromise on performance and features. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, faster charging, and a more vibrant display, and are willing to spend a bit more for a significantly enhanced user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco X6 Pro's Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is built on a 4nm process, which inherently offers better thermal efficiency than the 7nm Dimensity 6020 in the Oppo A2. While some heat generation is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the X6 Pro is expected to manage temperatures effectively, minimizing throttling and maintaining consistent performance. Xiaomi also typically implements robust cooling solutions in their 'Pro' series devices.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Poco X6 Pro compatible with all USB-C chargers?
The Poco X6 Pro supports 67W charging via USB-C and is compatible with Power Delivery (PD) 3.0 and Quick Charge (QC) 2.0 standards. While it will charge with any USB-C charger, you'll only achieve the full 67W speed with a charger that supports these protocols. Using a standard USB-C charger will still charge the phone, but at a slower rate.
❓ How does the Oppo A2 perform with multitasking and running multiple apps simultaneously?
The Oppo A2's Dimensity 6020 is adequate for basic multitasking, such as switching between messaging apps and browsing the web. However, it will likely struggle with demanding tasks like running multiple resource-intensive apps or editing large files. The X6 Pro, with its more powerful chipset and ample RAM, offers a significantly smoother and more responsive multitasking experience.
