Oppo A2 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and rapid charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the clear winner. Its 68W charging and impressive 10:28h active use score outweigh the Oppo A2’s lower price point. However, budget-conscious buyers will find the A2 a capable device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A2 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 03 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 06 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 51% in 30 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mystery Black, Glowing Green, Violet | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | PJB110 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Oppo A2
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable MediaTek Dimensity 6020 chipset
- Slower 33W charging
- Likely lower display brightness
- Limited camera information
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging
- Brighter 1073 nit display
- More powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Higher price compared to Oppo A2
- Battery capacity not specified (potential concern)
- May not justify the price increase for basic users
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Oppo A2, which lacks published brightness data and likely falls considerably lower. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the Neo’s higher peak brightness translates to a superior viewing experience in bright conditions. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests neither will dynamically adjust refresh rates for optimal power saving.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited data on the Oppo A2. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera system is likely to offer a more refined experience. While sensor sizes and apertures aren’t specified, the Edge 40 Neo’s focus on photo and video capabilities suggests a more robust image processing pipeline. The A2’s inclusion of a likely low-resolution macro lens is a common, often-underutilized feature in this price bracket, and shouldn’t be a deciding factor.
Performance
Both phones are powered by MediaTek Dimensity chips, but the Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm) holds a performance edge over the A2’s Dimensity 6020 (7nm). The 7030 features faster Cortex-A78 cores (2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz) which will result in snappier application loading and smoother multitasking. The 6nm process node of the 7030 also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While both CPUs share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the overall system performance will favor the Motorola.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery department. Its 10:28h active use score demonstrates excellent real-world endurance, significantly exceeding what we’d expect from a similarly priced device. Furthermore, the 68W wired charging is a game-changer, delivering a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Oppo A2’s 33W charging, while respectable, is considerably slower, taking 30 minutes to reach 51%. This difference in charging speed is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A2 if you need a reliable smartphone for everyday tasks and prioritize affordability above all else. It’s a good choice for users who don’t heavily game or rely on fast charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a brighter display, significantly faster charging speeds, and a longer-lasting battery for demanding usage, even if it means spending a bit more.