The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two popular contenders against each other: the Oppo A17 and the Samsung Galaxy A13. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the better overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A13 edges out the Oppo A17 thanks to its superior chipset, brighter display, and generally more refined software experience. While the Oppo A17 is a budget-friendly option, the A13 offers a more polished and performant package for a slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 26 | 2022, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 26 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.5 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistance | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35 (12 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Lake Blue, Sunlight Orange | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | CPH2477 | SM-A135F, SM-A135F/DS, SM-A135M, SM-A135U, SM-A135U1, SM-A135N |
| Price | € 159.99 / $ 168.76 / ₹ 8,999 | € 94.99 / $ 129.99 / £ 89.00 |
| SAR | - | 0.49 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.37 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 114h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1324:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 122822 (v8), 136286 (v9)
GeekBench: 588 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 5.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A17
- Very affordable
- Decent battery life
- Sleek design (subjective)
- Weak performance
- Dim display
- Basic camera
Samsung Galaxy A13
- Better performance
- Brighter display
- Improved camera
- More refined software
- Slightly more expensive
- 15W charging is slow
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A13 boasts a significantly brighter display (587 nits vs. likely around 400-450 nits for the A17) and a slightly better contrast ratio. While both offer a similar resolution, the A13's improved brightness makes it more usable outdoors. Color accuracy is likely better on the A13 as well, though both are LCD panels.
Camera Comparison
While both phones have similar camera setups on paper, the Samsung Galaxy A13's image processing is generally superior. Expect better dynamic range, more accurate colors, and less noise in photos taken with the A13. The A17's camera is serviceable but lacks the refinement of the A13.
Performance
Here, the Galaxy A13 shines. The Exynos 850 chipset (8nm) is considerably more powerful than the Helio G35 (12nm) in the Oppo A17. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A13. The A17 will handle basic tasks adequately, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with an endurance rating of 114 hours. Real-world usage will likely yield a full day of moderate use on both devices. The A13's 15W charging is a slight advantage over the A17's likely slower charging speed.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A17 is ideal for users prioritizing the absolute lowest price and basic functionality. The Samsung Galaxy A13 is a better choice for those seeking a smoother experience, a brighter display, and a more reliable camera, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A13's Exynos 850 chipset provides significantly better gaming performance than the Oppo A17's Helio G35.
❓ Is the Oppo A17 worth buying if I'm on a very tight budget?
Yes, the Oppo A17 can be a viable option if price is your absolute top priority. However, be prepared for compromises in performance and display quality.