The Oppo A17 and Nokia G11 Plus represent two compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone segment. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at a price point that won't break the bank, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dives deep into their core specifications, focusing on the critical differences in processing power and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and occasional gaming, the Oppo A17 is the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio G35 chipset, while not a powerhouse, offers a more balanced CPU performance profile than the Unisoc T606 in the Nokia G11 Plus. However, the Nokia G11 Plus offers a more conservative power draw.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 26 | 2022, June 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 26 | Available. Released 2022, July 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.8 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistance | Splash protection |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.67", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0" |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Lake Blue, Sunlight Orange | Lake Blue, Charcoal Grey |
| Models | CPH2477 | - |
| Price | € 159.99 / $ 168.76 / ₹ 8,999 | About 130 EUR |
Oppo A17
- Faster CPU performance for everyday tasks
- Likely faster charging speeds (unconfirmed)
- More responsive user experience
- Potentially higher power consumption
- Camera performance likely similar to Nokia G11 Plus
Nokia G11 Plus
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- Simpler software experience (typical of Nokia)
- Lower price point (potentially)
- Slower CPU performance
- Very slow 10W charging
- Less responsive user interface
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Nokia provide display specifications beyond resolution in their marketing materials. Assuming typical LCD panels for this price bracket, color accuracy and viewing angles will likely be similar. The absence of high refresh rates is standard. The focus here is on the internal hardware, as display quality is unlikely to be a differentiating factor.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar camera setups focused on basic photography. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The marketing materials for both devices emphasize the megapixel count over sensor size or lens quality, suggesting image processing will play a larger role than hardware capabilities. Expect similar results in good lighting conditions, with both struggling in low-light scenarios.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A17’s Mediatek Helio G35 utilizes a cluster of four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.3 GHz alongside another four at 1.8 GHz. This configuration prioritizes burst performance for short tasks. Conversely, the Nokia G11 Plus’s Unisoc T606 employs a big.LITTLE architecture with two Cortex-A75 cores at 1.6 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores, also at 1.6 GHz. The A75 cores offer higher single-core performance, but the G35’s higher clock speeds on its A53 cores give it an edge in multi-threaded tasks. The Unisoc T606's architecture is more power efficient, but the A17's CPU is faster.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device, but both likely house around a 5000mAh battery, typical for this segment. However, the Nokia G11 Plus is limited to 10W wired charging, meaning a full charge will take considerably longer than what the Oppo A17 likely supports (though Oppo doesn't advertise the wattage). The Unisoc T606’s power efficiency could translate to slightly longer battery life under moderate use, but the A17’s faster CPU could offset this during intensive tasks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A17 if you need a phone that feels snappier for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light app usage. Its CPU architecture is better suited for these workloads. Buy the Nokia G11 Plus if you prioritize maximizing battery life and prefer a simpler, more streamlined software experience, accepting a slight performance trade-off. The 10W charging is a significant drawback for those needing quick top-ups.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T606 in the Nokia G11 Plus struggle with multitasking compared to the Oppo A17?
Yes, the Unisoc T606, while efficient, is less capable in handling multiple apps simultaneously. The Oppo A17’s Helio G35, with its higher clocked cores, will provide a smoother experience when switching between applications or running demanding apps in the background.
❓ How significant is the 10W charging limitation on the Nokia G11 Plus?
The 10W charging on the Nokia G11 Plus is a substantial drawback. Expect a full charge to take well over 3 hours, potentially closer to 4, making it inconvenient for users who need quick top-ups throughout the day. The Oppo A17 likely supports faster charging, though the exact wattage isn't specified.
❓ Are either of these phones suitable for playing demanding mobile games like PUBG Mobile?
Neither phone is ideal for demanding games. While PUBG Mobile might be playable on low settings, expect significant frame rate drops and potential overheating. The Helio G35 in the Oppo A17 has a slight edge, but neither chipset is designed for intensive gaming.
