The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Two contenders vying for your attention are the Oppo A16K and the Xiaomi Redmi 12C. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the better overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi 12C emerges as the clear winner. While both are budget options, the Redmi 12C's significantly more powerful Helio G85 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost, making it a better choice for everyday tasks and light gaming. Both offer 10W charging, a significant drawback.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 08 | 2022, December 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 08 | Available. Released 2023, January 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 168.8 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4230 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Graphite Gray, Ocean Blue, Mint Green, Lavender Purple |
| Models | CPH2349 | 22120RN86G, 22120RN86I, 22126RN91Y, 2212ARNC4L |
| Price | About 550 EUR | £ 132.99 / € 107.41 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.64 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A16K
- Simple and reliable
- Affordable
- Decent battery life
- Slow performance
- Outdated chipset
- Slow charging
- Basic camera
Xiaomi Redmi 12C
- Better performance
- Improved camera (50MP)
- Modern design
- Good battery life
- Slow charging
- HD+ display (not FHD+)
- Budget build quality
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering adequate viewing for their price range. Color accuracy and brightness are typical for budget devices. The Redmi 12C might have a slightly more modern design with a flatter edge, but the difference is minimal.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo A16K typically features a 13MP main camera, while the Redmi 12C boasts a 50MP main camera. While megapixels aren't everything, the Redmi 12C generally captures more detailed photos in good lighting conditions. Both phones likely have similar selfie camera performance (around 5-8MP). Low-light performance will be average on both.
Performance
This is where the Redmi 12C shines. The Helio G85 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Helio G35 in the A16K. Expect smoother app loading, faster multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the Redmi 12C. The A16K will feel noticeably slower, especially when handling more demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to have a 5000mAh battery, offering all-day battery life under moderate usage. However, the slower 10W charging on both devices means it will take a considerable amount of time to fully recharge.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A16K is a decent choice for users prioritizing a simple, reliable phone for basic communication and media consumption. The Xiaomi Redmi 12C is ideal for those seeking a smoother experience, better performance for multitasking and gaming, and a slightly more modern design, even within a tight budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Redmi 12C is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Helio G85 chipset.
❓ Do both phones have NFC?
NFC availability varies by region. Check the specific model's specifications for your area.
❓ What is the storage capacity of each phone?
Both phones typically come in 32GB and 64GB storage options, expandable via microSD card.
❓ Which phone has a better design?
The Redmi 12C generally has a slightly more modern and appealing design with a flatter edge.