Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Oppo A16K and vivo Y02s are both contenders in the budget segment, offering essential features at attractive price points. But which one delivers the better overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo Y02s edges out the Oppo A16K thanks to its slightly faster processor and potentially improved software optimization. Both offer similar battery life and basic camera capabilities, making the Y02s a marginally better choice for everyday use, especially if you prioritize a smoother experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 08 | 2022, August 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 08 | Available. Released 2022, August 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 164 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF | 8 MP, f/2.0, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0; OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4230 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Vibrant Blue, Fluorite Black |
| Models | CPH2349 | V2203 |
| Price | About 550 EUR | About 100 EUR |
Oppo A16K
- Affordable price
- Large battery
- Decent for basic tasks
- Slow charging
- Basic camera
- Limited performance
vivo Y02s
- Slightly faster processor
- Good battery life
- Sleek design (potentially)
- Slow charging
- Basic camera
- Limited performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.51-inch HD+ (720 x 1600) display. While the panels are likely similar in quality (typically IPS LCD), the vivo Y02s might offer slightly better color accuracy or brightness due to potential software calibration differences. Expect adequate viewing angles and decent clarity for everyday use, but don't expect vibrant colors or high resolution.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a basic dual-camera setup, typically consisting of a 13MP main sensor and a 2MP depth sensor. Image quality will be adequate in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. The vivo Y02s might have slightly better software processing for improved color and dynamic range, but the difference is likely minimal.
Performance
The vivo Y02s holds a slight advantage here. While both utilize a Mediatek Helio processor, the Y02s uses the Helio P35, which has a marginally higher clock speed (2.35 GHz vs 2.3 GHz for the A16K's G35). This translates to slightly snappier performance in everyday tasks and potentially better gaming performance, though neither phone is a powerhouse.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to have a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate users. Charging is limited to 10W wired charging on both devices, so expect relatively slow charging times.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A16K is a good option for users prioritizing a very basic smartphone for calls, texts, and light social media use. The vivo Y02s is better suited for those who want a slightly more responsive device for everyday tasks and occasional gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the Helio G35 and Helio P35?
The Helio P35 generally offers slightly better performance due to a marginally higher clock speed and potentially more efficient architecture. However, the difference in real-world usage is not substantial.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
With 10W charging, expect around 2.5 to 3 hours to fully charge both the Oppo A16K and vivo Y02s from 0%.
