Oppo A16K vs Tecno Spark 8C: A Detailed Chipset and Performance Showdown

The Oppo A16K and Tecno Spark 8C represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point, but they diverge in their core processing power. This comparison dissects the differences between the MediaTek Helio G35 powering the Oppo A16K and the Unisoc T606 in the Tecno Spark 8C, revealing which phone offers a smoother user experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing consistent performance in everyday tasks, the Tecno Spark 8C emerges as the better choice. The Unisoc T606’s Cortex-A75 cores provide a noticeable advantage over the all-A53 configuration of the Helio G35, resulting in snappier app launches and smoother multitasking, despite both being 12nm chips.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo A16K Tecno Spark 8C
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41LTE
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2021, November 082022, January 31
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, November 08Available. Released 2022, February
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frameGlass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in)164.6 x 76 x 9 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight175 g (6.17 oz)-
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3-
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density)
Size6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 480 nits (typ)IPS LCD, 90Hz
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G57 MP1
OSAndroid 11, ColorOS 11.1Android 11 (Go edition), HiOS 7.6
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC
Internal32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual-13 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide) Auxiliary lens
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED lash, HDR
Single13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF8 MP
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRLED flash
Single5 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide)8 MP
Video1080p@30fps-
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE, aptXYes
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS
RadioUnspecifiedFM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0, OTGmicroUSB 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectYes
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging10W wired-
TypeLi-Po 4230 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, BlueTurquoise, Magnet Black, Iris Purple, Diamond Gray
ModelsCPH2349KG5k, KG5j, KG5n, MZ-TECNO KG5k
PriceAbout 550 EUR-

Oppo A16K

  • Established brand reputation (Oppo)
  • Potentially better software optimization (Oppo)
  • Simple and straightforward user experience

  • Inferior chipset performance (Helio G35)
  • Struggles with multitasking
  • Limited gaming capabilities

Tecno Spark 8C

  • More powerful chipset (Unisoc T606)
  • Snappier app launches and multitasking
  • Better overall performance for the price

  • Less well-known brand (Tecno)
  • Potentially more bloatware
  • Software updates may be less frequent

Display Comparison

Neither Oppo nor Tecno provide detailed display specifications beyond resolution. Given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels. The focus here is on performance, not display quality. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, and color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment. Without specific brightness data, it's difficult to assess outdoor visibility.

Camera Comparison

Both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards social media sharing. Without detailed sensor information, it’s safe to assume both rely on primary sensors around the 13MP mark, supplemented by auxiliary lenses of limited utility. Image processing will be the key differentiator, and Tecno often employs aggressive algorithms to enhance image quality, which may or may not appeal to all users. The absence of OIS on either device means low-light performance will be limited.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A16K’s MediaTek Helio G35 utilizes an octa-core configuration comprised entirely of Cortex-A53 cores, split between 2.3 GHz and 1.8 GHz. This is a relatively older architecture. Conversely, the Tecno Spark 8C’s Unisoc T606 features a more modern arrangement: two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz, paired with six Cortex-A55 cores, also at 1.6 GHz. The A75 cores offer significantly higher single-core performance, crucial for app responsiveness. While both are built on a 12nm process, the architectural advantage of the T606 translates to a more fluid user experience. The Helio G35 will struggle with heavier multitasking and demanding apps.

Battery Life

Both devices feature modest 10W charging, indicating similar charging times – expect well over 2 hours for a full charge. Battery capacity is not specified, but given the target market, both likely house batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The Unisoc T606’s improved efficiency *may* translate to slightly better battery life in real-world usage, but the difference will likely be marginal.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo A16K if you primarily need a phone for extremely basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media browsing, and value brand recognition. Buy the Tecno Spark 8C if you prefer a more responsive experience for everyday use, including moderate multitasking and occasional gaming, and are comfortable with a less established brand.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Tecno Spark 8C handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Unisoc T606 in the Tecno Spark 8C can run PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at lower graphics settings (balanced or low) and frame rates to maintain a playable experience. The Helio G35 in the Oppo A16K will struggle significantly with PUBG, even on the lowest settings.
❓ Is the software experience significantly different between Oppo and Tecno?
Oppo’s ColorOS is generally considered more polished and refined than Tecno’s HiOS, but both are based on Android and include pre-installed apps (bloatware). Oppo typically offers more consistent software updates, though both brands are not known for rapid Android version updates in this price segment.
❓ Does either phone support fast charging beyond 10W?
Neither the Oppo A16K nor the Tecno Spark 8C supports fast charging beyond the standard 10W wired charging. Expect a full charge to take over two hours in both cases.
❓ Which phone is better for someone who primarily uses WhatsApp and Facebook?
The Tecno Spark 8C is the better choice for WhatsApp and Facebook usage. The Unisoc T606’s more efficient processor will ensure smoother scrolling and faster loading times within these apps, compared to the Oppo A16K’s Helio G35.