The Oppo A16 and A16K are both budget-friendly smartphones aiming to deliver value. While they share a similar core processor, subtle differences in features and design might make one a better choice for you. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which Oppo phone is right for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A16 edges out the A16K primarily due to its slightly improved camera capabilities and potentially more refined software experience. Both offer similar performance thanks to the Helio G35, but the A16's overall package presents a more compelling value proposition for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 08 | 2021, July 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 08 | Available. Released 2021, July 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 163.8 x 75.6 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4230 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Pearl Blue, Space Silver, Crystal Black |
| Models | CPH2349 | CPH2269 |
| Price | About 550 EUR | £ 88.50 / € 109.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A16K
- Very affordable
- Decent battery life
- Lightweight design
- Slow 10W charging
- Basic camera performance
- Limited storage options
Oppo A16
- Slightly better camera
- Potentially more refined software
- Good battery life
- Still a budget phone
- Performance limitations
- Average display quality
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.52-inch IPS LCD display with a 720 x 1600 resolution. While the panels are similar, slight variations in color accuracy and brightness might exist, but these are unlikely to be significant differences for everyday use. Expect a standard, budget-friendly display experience on both.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo A16 generally has a slightly better camera setup. While both feature a 13MP main sensor, the A16 often includes a depth sensor for improved portrait mode performance. The A16K might have a slightly simpler camera app. Expect decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but struggles in low light.
Performance
Performance is virtually identical. Both devices are powered by the Mediatek Helio G35 chipset, which is adequate for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. Don't expect blazing-fast speeds or seamless multitasking with either phone. Resource-intensive games will require low settings.
Battery Life
Both phones typically feature a 5000mAh battery, offering all-day battery life for moderate users. The Oppo A16K has a slower 10W charging, which is a notable disadvantage compared to faster charging solutions available on other devices.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A16K is a good option for users prioritizing the absolute lowest price point and basic smartphone functionality. The Oppo A16 is better suited for those who want a slightly better camera and potentially a more polished software experience without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo A16K worth buying?
The Oppo A16K is a good option if you're on a very tight budget and only need basic smartphone features. However, the Oppo A16 offers a slightly better overall experience for a small price increase.
❓ What is the difference between the Oppo A16 and A16K?
The main differences are the camera setup (A16 has a depth sensor) and charging speed (A16K has slower 10W charging). Performance is largely the same due to the shared chipset.
