The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo A16K and Infinix Hot 11s NFC represent compelling options for users prioritizing affordability. While both devices aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality, they diverge significantly in their core processing power and charging capabilities, making the choice less straightforward than it appears. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Infinix Hot 11s NFC emerges as the stronger contender. Its Helio G88 chipset, featuring more powerful Cortex-A75 cores, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Oppo A16K’s Helio G35, especially in gaming and multitasking. The 18W charging also significantly reduces downtime compared to the A16K’s sluggish 10W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 08 | 2022, February 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 08 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 168.9 x 77 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4230 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Polar Black, Green Wave, Purple |
| Models | CPH2349 | - |
| Price | About 550 EUR | About 230 EUR |
Oppo A16K
- Potentially more durable build quality (based on Oppo's reputation)
- Simpler user interface for beginners
- Lower price point (potentially)
- Significantly weaker processor performance
- Slow 10W charging
- Limited gaming capabilities
Infinix Hot 11s NFC
- More powerful Helio G88 processor
- Faster 18W charging
- Better multitasking and gaming performance
- Infinix's software can be bloated with pre-installed apps
- Potentially less refined build quality compared to Oppo
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. However, detailed display specs (resolution, brightness, color gamut) are missing. The focus here is on processing power, not visual fidelity. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, impacting the overall screen-to-body ratio. Color accuracy will likely be standard for the segment, prioritizing power efficiency over color calibration.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar in real-world usage, given the typical limitations of budget smartphone sensors. Detailed sensor information is absent, but both will likely feature a primary sensor paired with auxiliary lenses of limited utility (e.g., a 2MP macro). The aperture of the main sensor will be a key determinant of low-light performance, but this information is unavailable. Image processing will likely prioritize sharpening and contrast to compensate for sensor limitations. Don't expect flagship-level image quality from either device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Hot 11s NFC’s Mediatek Helio G88 (12nm) is a clear upgrade over the Oppo A16K’s Helio G35 (12nm). The G88 utilizes a dual-core Cortex-A75 configuration clocked at 2.0 GHz alongside six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz. This contrasts with the A16K’s eight Cortex-A53 cores, all clocked at either 2.3 GHz or 1.8 GHz. The A75 cores in the G88 offer significantly higher single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother overall responsiveness. While both are 12nm chips, the architectural improvements in the G88 provide a tangible benefit. The G88’s GPU is also more capable, offering a better gaming experience, even if limited to medium settings. The A16K will struggle with more demanding titles.
Battery Life
While battery capacity is not specified, both devices likely feature batteries in the 5000mAh range, typical for this segment. However, the Infinix Hot 11s NFC’s 18W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Oppo A16K’s 10W charging. This translates to a much faster 0-100% charge time, reducing downtime and improving usability. The faster charging is particularly beneficial for users who rely heavily on their smartphones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A16K if you prioritize extreme simplicity and a minimal feature set for basic communication and light tasks. It’s ideal for first-time smartphone users or those needing a durable, no-frills device. Buy the Infinix Hot 11s NFC if you value performance for gaming, smoother multitasking, and faster charging. It’s the better choice for users who actively use social media, stream videos, or play mobile games.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Infinix Hot 11s NFC struggle with popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
While the Helio G88 can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty, you'll likely need to play on medium graphics settings and potentially lower the frame rate to maintain a stable experience. The A16K's Helio G35 will struggle significantly with these titles, even on the lowest settings.
❓ Does the Infinix Hot 11s NFC's NFC functionality work with Google Pay or other mobile payment services?
Yes, the Infinix Hot 11s NFC includes NFC (Near Field Communication) and is compatible with Google Pay and other NFC-based mobile payment services, allowing for contactless payments. The Oppo A16K does *not* have NFC.
❓ Is the software on the Infinix Hot 11s NFC heavily customized and filled with bloatware?
Infinix's XOS software is known for being heavily customized and often includes pre-installed apps (bloatware). While you can uninstall some of these apps, it's a common complaint among users. The Oppo A16K typically offers a cleaner software experience, though it still includes some pre-installed apps.
