The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Oppo A16e and the Samsung Galaxy A04e. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the better overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A04e edges out the Oppo A16e thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and potentially better software support. While both are budget options, the A04e offers a small performance boost and the Samsung brand reputation, making it a more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 21 | 2022, October 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 24 | Available. Released 2022, November 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio P22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4230 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Black, Copper, Light Blue |
| Models | CPH2421 | SM-A042F, SM-A042F/DS, SM-A042M, SM-A042M/DS |
| Price | About 120 EUR | ₹ 7,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.29 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A16e
- Affordable
- Decent battery life
- Reliable for basic tasks
- Slow charging (10W)
- Less powerful chipset
- Basic camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A04e
- Slightly better performance
- Samsung brand reputation
- Potentially better software support
- Likely slightly faster charging
- Still a budget phone with limitations
- Basic camera performance
- LCD display
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar LCD displays, probably around 6.5 inches with a standard resolution (720 x 1600). Expect decent viewing angles but limited color accuracy. The A04e *might* have a slightly brighter panel, but this is difficult to confirm without specific testing data.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are often a weak point in budget phones. Both likely feature a primary 13MP camera and a depth sensor. Image quality will be adequate in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. The A04e *may* have slightly better image processing due to Samsung's software optimization.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A04e's Helio P35 chipset holds a slight advantage over the Oppo A16e's Helio P22. The P35's slightly higher clock speeds and different core configuration should translate to marginally better performance in everyday tasks and light gaming. Don't expect flagship-level speeds from either device.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a 5000mAh battery, offering all-day battery life with moderate usage. The Oppo A16e's 10W charging is a significant disadvantage compared to the A04e, which *may* support slightly faster charging (though specific charging speeds are often unconfirmed for these models).
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A16e? Users prioritizing a very basic, reliable phone for calls, texts, and light social media use. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A04e? Those seeking a slightly smoother experience, a bit more processing power for multitasking, and the familiarity of the Samsung ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A04e's Helio P35 chipset offers a slight edge in gaming performance compared to the Oppo A16e's Helio P22.
❓ How long will the battery last on each phone?
Both phones are expected to offer all-day battery life with moderate usage thanks to their 5000mAh batteries.
