The Oppo A15 and Infinix Smart 5 Pro represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device offers the best value for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall responsiveness and slightly better efficiency, the Oppo A15 is the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Helio P35, despite being older, benefits from a more refined 12nm process, offering a smoother experience than the Infinix Smart 5 Pro’s 28nm Unisoc SC9863A.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 15. Released 2020, October 27 | 2021, November 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, November 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 164.4 x 75.6 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 11 (Go edition), XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/1.8, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash |
| Single | - | 8 MP |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 8 MP |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4230 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Black, Mystery Blue | Morandi Green, Heart of Ocean |
| Models | CPH2185 | - |
| Price | About 550 EUR | About 70 EUR |
Oppo A15
- More efficient processor (12nm Helio P35)
- Potentially smoother performance in apps
- Likely better sustained performance due to thermal efficiency
- May be slightly more expensive than the Infinix Smart 5 Pro
- Limited detailed specifications available
Infinix Smart 5 Pro
- Generally lower price point
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- Functional for essential smartphone features
- Less efficient processor (28nm Unisoc SC9863A)
- Potential for throttling under sustained load
- Slower app loading times compared to the Oppo A15
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Infinix provide display specifications beyond resolution in their marketing materials. Given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels. However, the absence of detailed specs makes a direct comparison impossible. We can infer that both will offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences, prioritizing cost over color accuracy or brightness. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are expected to feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the market segment suggests both will rely heavily on software processing to enhance image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization. Image quality will likely be comparable, with both struggling in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A15’s Mediatek Helio P35, fabricated on a 12nm process, offers a more modern architecture than the Infinix Smart 5 Pro’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). While both are octa-core CPUs, the Helio P35’s Cortex-A53 cores are clocked higher (2.35GHz vs 1.6GHz), and the process node is significantly smaller. This translates to better power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance. The Unisoc SC9863A’s larger process node means more power is required for the same tasks, leading to increased heat and potential throttling. Users engaging in light gaming or multitasking will likely experience a smoother experience on the Oppo A15.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 10W wired charging, indicating similar charging speeds. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Helio P35’s superior efficiency in the Oppo A15 *could* result in slightly longer battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the Infinix Smart 5 Pro. However, the difference is unlikely to be substantial, and real-world battery life will heavily depend on usage patterns.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A15 if you need a phone that feels a bit more responsive for everyday tasks like browsing and social media, and if you value a slightly more efficient processor that *may* translate to marginally better battery life. Buy the Infinix Smart 5 Pro if you prioritize absolute lowest cost and are willing to accept some performance compromises, particularly in multitasking and more demanding applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc SC9863A in the Infinix Smart 5 Pro struggle with multiple apps open simultaneously?
Yes, the Unisoc SC9863A’s 28nm process and lower clock speeds mean it will likely exhibit noticeable slowdowns when multitasking with several apps open. The Oppo A15’s Helio P35, with its more efficient architecture, will handle multitasking more gracefully.
❓ Is the difference in processor efficiency between the Helio P35 and SC9863A noticeable in everyday use?
While not dramatically different, the Helio P35’s 12nm process offers a tangible advantage in power efficiency. This translates to slightly less heat generation and potentially a few extra minutes of battery life during typical usage, such as browsing, social media, and calls.
❓ Can either of these phones handle popular mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
Both phones will struggle to deliver a smooth gaming experience in demanding titles like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile. You’ll likely need to play at the lowest graphics settings and accept significant frame rate drops. The Helio P35 in the Oppo A15 will offer a marginally better experience, but neither is designed for serious gaming.
