The Oppo A11s and vivo Y11 (2023) represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The Oppo leverages Qualcomm's Snapdragon 460, while the vivo opts for MediaTek's Helio P35. This comparison dissects these core differences, revealing which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A11s emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 460 chipset, built on a more efficient 11nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Helio P35. While the vivo Y11 (2023) offers reverse wired charging, the Oppo’s faster 18W charging and superior processing power make it the better all-rounder.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 27 | 2023, April 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 27 | Available. Released 2023, April 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 164 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, White | Cosmic Grey, Orchid Blue |
| Models | - | V2236A |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 120 EUR |
Oppo A11s
- Faster Snapdragon 460 processor
- More efficient 11nm fabrication process
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Likely lacks advanced display features
- Camera performance likely average
vivo Y11 (2023)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially lower price point
- Acceptable for basic tasks
- Slower Helio P35 processor
- Less efficient 12nm fabrication process
- Slower 10W wired charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing, we can infer both likely utilize standard LCD panels. The absence of specifications like resolution or refresh rate suggests both are targeting the bare minimum for functionality. Bezels are likely comparable, given the price bracket. Color accuracy is unlikely to be a strong point on either device, and neither is expected to feature features like HDR support.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both devices feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The absence of information regarding sensor size or optical image stabilization (OIS) suggests neither phone will excel in low-light conditions. The focus should be on the primary sensor, as any additional sensors (likely 2MP macro or depth sensors) will offer limited utility. Image processing will likely be heavily reliant on software algorithms to enhance image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A11s’ Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (11nm) benefits from a smaller fabrication process compared to the vivo Y11 (2023)’s MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm). This translates to better power efficiency and, crucially, improved sustained performance. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 460’s Kryo 240 cores, even at varying clock speeds (1.8 GHz & 1.6 GHz), generally outperform the Helio P35’s Cortex-A53 cores (2.35 GHz & 1.8 GHz) in real-world tasks. The higher clock speed of the Helio P35 doesn't necessarily equate to faster performance due to architectural differences. Users will notice this difference in app loading times and multitasking.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified, but both phones likely house batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range, typical for this price segment. The Oppo A11s’ 18W wired charging is a significant advantage over the vivo Y11 (2023)’s 10W charging. This means the Oppo will charge considerably faster, reducing downtime. The vivo Y11 (2023) does offer 5W reverse wired charging, allowing it to act as a power bank for accessories, a niche feature that may appeal to some users, but doesn't offset the charging speed deficit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A11s if you prioritize smoother app performance, quicker multitasking, and faster charging speeds. This phone is ideal for users who frequently use social media, browse the web, or play casual games. Buy the vivo Y11 (2023) if you absolutely need the convenience of reverse wired charging to top up accessories, and are willing to accept a trade-off in processing power and charging speed. It’s a better fit for users who primarily make calls, send texts, and occasionally check email.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P35 in the vivo Y11 (2023) struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While the Helio P35 can handle basic apps like Facebook and WhatsApp, you may experience occasional lag or slowdowns, especially when multitasking. The Snapdragon 460 in the Oppo A11s offers a smoother experience for these everyday tasks due to its more efficient architecture.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Oppo A11s with the 18W charger?
Assuming a typical 4000-5000 mAh battery, the Oppo A11s should fully charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 2-2.5 hours with the included 18W charger. This is significantly faster than the vivo Y11 (2023)'s 10W charging, which could take upwards of 3-4 hours.
❓ Is the reverse charging feature on the vivo Y11 (2023) useful for more than just earbuds?
The 5W reverse charging is primarily suited for small accessories like wireless earbuds or a smartwatch. It's not powerful enough to significantly charge a smartphone or tablet, and the process is quite slow. It's a convenience feature, but not a primary reason to choose this phone.
