The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Two contenders vying for your attention are the Oppo A11s and the Samsung Galaxy A21s. Both promise a solid experience, but which one truly delivers? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A21s edges out the Oppo A11s thanks to its slightly more powerful processor, brighter display, and longer-lasting battery. While the A11s offers a decent experience, the A21s provides a more well-rounded package for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 27 | 2020, May 15. Released 2020, June 02 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 27 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 163.7 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4/6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, White | Black, White, Blue, Red |
| Models | - | SM-A217F, SM-A217F/DS, SM-A217F/DSN, SM-A217M, SM-A217M/DS, SM-A217N |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 220 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.42 W/kg (head) 1.54 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1287:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 107157 (v8)
GeekBench: 1100 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A11s
- Clean software experience
- Compact design (likely)
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Less powerful processor
- Lower brightness display
- Shorter battery life
- Unknown camera quality
Samsung Galaxy A21s
- Brighter display
- Longer battery life
- More powerful processor
- Likely better camera quality
- Samsung's brand recognition
- Potentially larger size
- Samsung's One UI can be resource-intensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A21s boasts a brighter display (490 nits vs unknown for A11s) and a similar contrast ratio (1287:1). While both offer decent viewing angles, the A21s' higher brightness makes it more usable outdoors. The A11s likely has a slightly smaller screen, which some may prefer for one-handed use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer a multi-camera setup, but specifics are missing. Generally, Samsung's image processing tends to be more refined. The A21s likely offers better low-light performance and more versatile shooting options. The A11s camera is likely adequate for casual snapshots.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A21s' Exynos 850 (8nm) generally outperforms the Oppo A11s' Snapdragon 460 (11nm). The Exynos 850's Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz provide a noticeable boost in everyday tasks and light gaming. The A11s' Snapdragon 460 is adequate for basic usage but may struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A21s shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 119 hours. The Oppo A11s' battery life is respectable, but falls short of the A21s' longevity. This makes the A21s a better choice for heavy users.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A11s? Users prioritizing a clean software experience and a slightly more compact design might find the A11s appealing. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A21s? Those seeking a brighter display, longer battery life, and a more powerful processor for smoother multitasking should opt for the A21s.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A21s, with its Exynos 850 processor, generally offers better gaming performance than the Oppo A11s.
❓ Is the Oppo A11s worth considering if I only need a basic phone?
Yes, the Oppo A11s can be a good option for basic tasks like calling, texting, and browsing, especially if you prefer a cleaner software experience and a more compact size.
