The Oppo A11s and Huawei Y7p represent compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone space. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at a low price point, they take different approaches to achieving this. The A11s leverages Qualcomm's Snapdragon 460, while the Y7p relies on Huawei's in-house Kirin 710F. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the Oppo A11s emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 460, built on a more modern 11nm process, offers a performance edge over the Y7p’s 12nm Kirin 710F, despite the latter’s higher clock speeds. While the Y7p offers a slightly faster CPU on paper, the A11s’ chipset architecture provides a more balanced experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - ART-L29 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - ART-L28 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 27 | 2020, February 07. Released 2020, February 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 27 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 159.8 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.29 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Kirin 710F (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), EMUI 9, no Google Play Services |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, White | Aurora Blue, Midnight Black |
| Models | - | ART-L28, ART-L29 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 140 EUR |
Oppo A11s
- More efficient Snapdragon 460 chipset
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Potentially better long-term software support
- Likely basic camera system
- Display specifications are unknown
Huawei Y7p
- Potentially better image processing due to Kirin ISP
- Higher CPU clock speeds (on paper)
- Huawei ecosystem integration
- Less efficient 12nm Kirin 710F
- Slower 10W wired charging
- Potential app availability issues due to Huawei restrictions
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Huawei provide display specifications beyond the basic resolution. However, given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels. The key difference lies in the underlying chipsets’ ability to drive the displays efficiently. The Snapdragon 460’s Adreno 610 GPU, while entry-level, is likely more optimized for modern display standards than the Mali-G51 MP4 in the Y7p. This could translate to slightly smoother scrolling and animations on the A11s.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are unavailable for both devices. However, given their market positioning, both likely feature basic camera setups. The focus should be on image processing capabilities. Huawei’s Kirin chipsets traditionally excel in image signal processing (ISP), potentially giving the Y7p an edge in still photography, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. However, the Snapdragon 460’s ISP is also capable, and Oppo’s software optimizations could close the gap. The absence of OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The Kirin 710F boasts a higher peak clock speed (2.2 GHz Cortex-A73) compared to the Snapdragon 460’s Kryo 240 cores (1.8 GHz). However, the Snapdragon 460 benefits from a more efficient 11nm manufacturing process versus the Kirin 710F’s 12nm process. This translates to better thermal management and sustained performance under load. The Snapdragon 460’s architecture, while utilizing Kryo 240 cores, is generally more efficient than the older Cortex-A73/A53 combination in the Kirin 710F. This means the A11s is less likely to throttle during extended gaming sessions or demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Oppo A11s’ 18W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Huawei Y7p’s 10W charging. This faster charging speed will drastically reduce the time required to replenish the battery, offering a more convenient user experience. Even with a slightly smaller battery, the A11s’ faster charging could result in less downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A11s if you need a phone capable of handling everyday tasks smoothly and offering a more responsive experience with modern apps. It’s ideal for users who occasionally play mobile games and value a chipset with better long-term software support. Buy the Huawei Y7p if you prioritize a slightly faster CPU for basic multitasking and are deeply embedded within the Huawei ecosystem, accepting potential limitations in app availability and software updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Kirin 710F in the Huawei Y7p struggle with demanding apps like Facebook or Instagram?
While the Kirin 710F can handle basic apps, its older architecture and lower efficiency may result in noticeable lag or slowdowns when running resource-intensive applications like Facebook or Instagram, especially with multiple apps open simultaneously. The Snapdragon 460 in the Oppo A11s is better equipped to handle these workloads smoothly.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Oppo A11s with the 18W charger?
While the exact 0-100% charge time depends on the battery capacity (which is unspecified), the 18W charging on the Oppo A11s should take approximately 1.5 to 2.5 hours for a full charge. This is significantly faster than the Huawei Y7p’s 10W charging, which could take upwards of 3-4 hours.
❓ Does the Huawei Y7p support Google Mobile Services (GMS)?
The Huawei Y7p does *not* natively support Google Mobile Services (GMS) due to ongoing restrictions. It relies on Huawei Mobile Services (HMS) and the AppGallery. This means access to popular apps like Google Maps, Gmail, and YouTube requires workarounds, if available at all.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 460 in the Oppo A11s capable of playing popular mobile games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 460 can run PUBG Mobile, but likely at lower graphics settings (balanced or low) to maintain a playable frame rate. Expect some occasional stuttering during intense firefights. The Kirin 710F might offer slightly better frame rates at similar settings, but the A11s’ better thermal management will prevent throttling during longer gaming sessions.