The Oppo A11s and Honor 9X Lite represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their core hardware. This comparison dives deep into the differences between the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 and Kirin 710F chipsets, analyzing their impact on performance, battery life, and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and future-proofing, the Oppo A11s emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 460, built on a more modern 11nm process, offers a slight edge in efficiency and sustained performance, despite the Kirin 710F's higher clock speeds. The faster 18W charging is also a significant advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 27 | 2020, April 17. Released 2020, May 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 27 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 160.4 x 76.6 x 7.8 mm (6.31 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.2 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Kirin 710F (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| OS | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), EMUI 9.1, Google Play Services |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 3750 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, White | Emerald Green, Midnight Black |
| Models | - | JSN-L21, JSN-L22, JSN-L23 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 220 EUR |
Oppo A11s
- More efficient Snapdragon 460 chipset
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Lower peak CPU clock speed
- May lack advanced display features
Honor 9X Lite
- Higher CPU clock speeds for bursty tasks
- Potentially lower initial price
- Familiar Honor UI
- Less efficient Kirin 710F chipset
- Slower 10W wired charging
- Potential for more thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Honor provide display specifications beyond the basic resolution. However, the choice of chipset impacts the display's responsiveness. The Snapdragon 460's Adreno 610 GPU is more capable of driving a smooth UI experience, even if both phones utilize similar LCD panels. The 12nm Kirin 710F may exhibit slightly more strain when rendering complex animations, potentially leading to minor stuttering. Without detailed brightness or color accuracy data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the GPU advantage leans towards the Oppo.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is challenging. Both phones likely feature similar budget-oriented camera setups. However, the Snapdragon 460’s image signal processor (ISP) is generally more advanced, potentially leading to better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The Honor 9X Lite may rely more heavily on software processing to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor. The presence of a dedicated ISP within the Snapdragon 460 allows for faster and more efficient image capture and processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor 9X Lite’s Kirin 710F (12nm) boasts a higher peak CPU clock speed (2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz on the Oppo A11s’ Snapdragon 460). However, the Snapdragon 460 benefits from a smaller 11nm fabrication process, resulting in improved power efficiency and thermal management. While the Kirin 710F’s Cortex-A73 cores offer strong single-core performance, the Snapdragon 460’s Kryo 240 cores, combined with the process node advantage, provide more sustained performance during prolonged use. This translates to less throttling during gaming or demanding applications. The Snapdragon 460 also features a more modern GPU (Adreno 610) compared to the Mali-G51 MP4 in the Kirin 710F, offering better graphics performance.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn't specified, the Oppo A11s’ 18W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Honor 9X Lite’s 10W charging. This means significantly faster top-up times, reducing downtime. The Snapdragon 460’s improved power efficiency also contributes to potentially longer battery life, even with a similar capacity battery. The 12nm Kirin 710F will likely consume more power under load, impacting overall battery endurance. The faster charging speed of the Oppo A11s is a practical benefit for users who frequently need to recharge their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A11s if you need a phone that handles everyday tasks smoothly and offers a more responsive experience for light gaming and multitasking. Its newer chipset provides a degree of future-proofing. Buy the Honor 9X Lite if you prioritize raw CPU clock speed for specific, bursty tasks and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It may offer a slightly snappier feel for launching apps, but will likely struggle more under sustained load.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Kirin 710F overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Kirin 710F, built on a 12nm process, is more prone to thermal throttling than the Snapdragon 460. While it can handle casual gaming, extended sessions with graphically demanding titles may lead to noticeable performance drops as the chip heats up. The Oppo A11s, with its 11nm Snapdragon 460, is better equipped to maintain consistent performance over longer periods.
❓ How much faster is the 18W charging on the Oppo A11s compared to the 10W charging on the Honor 9X Lite?
The 18W charging on the Oppo A11s will significantly reduce charging times. While exact 0-100% times depend on battery capacity, expect the Oppo A11s to charge roughly 40-60% faster than the Honor 9X Lite. This is a substantial difference for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 460 offer a noticeable improvement in app loading times compared to the Kirin 710F?
While the Kirin 710F has higher clock speeds, the Snapdragon 460's more efficient architecture and modern GPU contribute to a smoother overall experience. App loading times will likely be similar for basic apps, but the Snapdragon 460 should exhibit faster loading times for more complex applications and games.
