The Oppo A11k and Xiaomi Redmi 9i Sport represent the fiercely competitive entry-level smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an incredibly affordable price point. This comparison dives deep into their core specifications, focusing on the differences in processing power, battery performance, and overall user experience to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing slightly better CPU performance and the convenience of 10W charging, the Xiaomi Redmi 9i Sport emerges as the winner. While the Oppo A11k is a capable device, the G25 chipset offers a modest but noticeable advantage in everyday tasks and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 22. Released 2020, June 22 | 2021, September 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 155.9 x 75.5 x 8.3 mm (6.14 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 9 mm (6.49 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6.1 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4230 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Flowing Silver, Deep Blue | Carbon Black, Coral Green, Metallic Blue |
| Models | CPH2083, CPH2071 | - |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | 1.32 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo A11k
- Potentially slightly faster single-core performance due to higher CPU clock speed.
- Simple and user-friendly interface (typical of Oppo's ColorOS).
- Likely a competitive price point.
- Helio P35 chipset is less optimized for gaming compared to the G25.
- Charging specifications are unknown, potentially slower than the Redmi 9i Sport.
Xiaomi Redmi 9i Sport
- Helio G25 chipset offers improved GPU performance for casual gaming.
- Includes 10W wired charging for added convenience.
- Potentially better thermal management due to the G25's efficiency.
- Slightly lower CPU clock speed compared to the Oppo A11k.
- Xiaomi's MIUI can be resource-intensive and include bloatware.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize standard IPS LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Detailed specifications regarding brightness (nits) and color gamut coverage are unavailable, but we can assume both offer adequate, though not exceptional, viewing experiences indoors. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within their respective form factors. Color accuracy will likely be standard for the segment, prioritizing vibrancy over absolute fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be limited. Detailed sensor information is lacking, but it’s safe to assume both feature a primary sensor paired with auxiliary lenses of minimal utility (likely 2MP depth or macro sensors). Image quality will be heavily reliant on software processing, and low-light performance will be subpar. The aperture of the main sensor will be a key determinant of image quality, but without specific data, it’s difficult to assess which device holds an advantage. Users should temper expectations regarding camera capabilities on both the A11k and 9i Sport.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi 9i Sport’s Mediatek Helio G25 (12nm) features a slightly lower clocked CPU (2.0 GHz vs 2.35 GHz on the Oppo A11k’s Helio P35) but benefits from architectural improvements within the G-series, designed for gaming. While both utilize the same Cortex-A53 cores, the G25’s optimized GPU provides a marginal advantage in graphics performance. The A11k’s higher CPU clock speed might show a slight edge in single-core tasks, but the G25’s overall efficiency and gaming focus make it the more versatile choice. Both devices will likely be paired with 3GB or 4GB of RAM, impacting multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but typical for this segment is around 5000mAh. The Redmi 9i Sport includes 10W wired charging, a significant convenience factor. The Oppo A11k’s charging capabilities are not specified, but it’s likely to be similar or potentially slower. While a larger battery capacity *could* offset slower charging, the 10W charging on the Redmi 9i Sport provides a tangible benefit for users who frequently need to top up their device throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A11k if you prioritize a simple, straightforward Android experience and are less concerned with demanding applications. It's a solid choice for basic communication and media consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 9i Sport if you prefer a slightly more responsive experience, particularly when multitasking or playing casual games, and value the added convenience of wired charging, even at a slower 10W rate.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi 9i Sport handle games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
While the Helio G25 is designed for gaming, PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty will likely only be playable at the lowest graphics settings and frame rates. Expect a compromised gaming experience, suitable for casual play but not competitive gaming.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Redmi 9i Sport slow compared to other phones?
Yes, 10W charging is relatively slow by modern standards. A full charge will take approximately 3-4 hours. However, for a budget device, it's a welcome addition compared to potentially slower or non-existent charging on the Oppo A11k.
❓ Does either phone support fast charging?
Neither the Oppo A11k nor the Xiaomi Redmi 9i Sport support fast charging technologies like Quick Charge or Power Delivery. Both are limited to standard charging speeds.
❓ How much storage do these phones typically come with, and is it expandable?
Both phones typically ship with 32GB of internal storage, which is quite limited. Fortunately, both devices support microSD card expansion, allowing you to add up to 256GB or 512GB of additional storage.
