The Oppo A11k and Tecno Spark Go 2020 represent the ultra-budget end of the smartphone spectrum. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price point. However, beneath the similar price tags lie significant differences in processing power, stemming from their respective Mediatek Helio chipsets. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which device offers the best value for users prioritizing performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user needing a functional smartphone for basic tasks, the Oppo A11k emerges as the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio P35 chipset, with its octa-core configuration, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Tecno Spark Go 2020’s quad-core Helio A20, resulting in smoother multitasking and app loading.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 22. Released 2020, June 22 | 2020, September 01. Released 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 155.9 x 75.5 x 8.3 mm (6.14 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 165.6 x 76.3 x 9.1 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6761D Helio A20 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6.1 | Android 10 (Go edition), HIOS 6.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/1.8, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 4230 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Flowing Silver, Deep Blue | Ice Jadeite, Aqua Blue, Sky Black |
| Models | CPH2083, CPH2071 | KE5S |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 80 EUR |
| SAR | 1.32 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo A11k
- Faster processor for smoother multitasking
- Octa-core CPU offers better app loading times
- Potentially better image processing
- May consume slightly more battery
- Likely similar display quality to the Tecno
Tecno Spark Go 2020
- Potentially longer battery life
- Lower cost (likely)
- Sufficient for very basic tasks
- Significantly slower processor
- Struggles with multitasking
- Limited performance for modern apps
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context of these phones, display specs are likely similar – 720p+ resolution LCD panels. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but on basic usability. Without specific brightness or color accuracy data, it's safe to assume both offer a standard, budget-friendly viewing experience. Bezels are likely substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.
Camera Comparison
Both devices likely feature basic camera setups, with the primary sensor being the most important factor. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement. However, given the market segment, both will likely rely on software processing to enhance image quality. The inclusion of 2MP macro or depth sensors on either device is largely marketing fluff and shouldn’t be a deciding factor. The Helio P35’s slightly better image signal processor (ISP) might offer a marginal improvement in image processing speed on the Oppo A11k.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A11k’s Mediatek Helio P35 is an octa-core processor featuring four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.35 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Tecno Spark Go 2020’s Helio A20, a quad-core processor with all cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. The Helio P35’s octa-core architecture allows for more efficient multitasking and better performance in demanding applications. While both are built on a 12nm process, the additional cores and higher clock speeds of the P35 translate to a significantly faster user experience. The A20 is geared towards minimal power consumption, prioritizing battery life over performance.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is likely similar on both devices, around 3000-4000 mAh. The Tecno Spark Go 2020, with its less powerful Helio A20, will likely exhibit slightly better battery life due to lower power consumption. However, the Oppo A11k’s more efficient multitasking capabilities might offset this advantage for users who frequently switch between apps. Charging wattage is likely low on both, meaning 0-100% charge times will be in the 2-3 hour range.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A11k if you need a phone capable of handling more than just the most basic tasks – light social media, occasional gaming, and running multiple apps simultaneously. The extra processing cores will make a tangible difference. Buy the Tecno Spark Go 2020 if your primary needs are limited to calls, texts, and very light app usage, and you prioritize minimizing cost above all else. It’s a functional device for those with extremely limited demands.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Tecno Spark Go 2020 struggle with WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the Tecno Spark Go 2020 can run WhatsApp and Facebook, users may experience noticeable lag when switching between the apps or loading media. The Helio A20’s quad-core processor is designed for basic tasks, and these social media apps can be surprisingly demanding.
❓ Can the Oppo A11k handle light gaming like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers?
The Oppo A11k, with its Helio P35, is better equipped for light gaming than the Tecno Spark Go 2020. While it won’t handle graphically intensive games, titles like Candy Crush and Subway Surfers should be playable with acceptable frame rates. Expect to lower graphics settings for optimal performance.
❓ Is the difference in performance between these two phones really noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the difference is noticeable, especially when multitasking. The Oppo A11k’s octa-core processor allows for smoother app switching and faster loading times. The Tecno Spark Go 2020 will feel sluggish in comparison when running multiple apps or opening heavier applications.
