The Oppo A11k and Motorola Moto E6 Plus represent the extreme end of the smartphone price spectrum. Both aim to deliver essential functionality at a minimal cost, but they achieve this with different hardware choices. This comparison dissects those choices, focusing on how the chipset differences impact real-world performance and user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A11k offers a slightly better experience due to its more powerful Mediatek Helio P35 chipset. While the Moto E6 Plus benefits from 10W charging, the A11k’s CPU advantage translates to snappier app loading and smoother multitasking, making it the better all-rounder.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 22. Released 2020, June 22 | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 16 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 155.9 x 75.5 x 8.3 mm (6.14 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 155.6 x 73.1 x 8.6 mm (6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 149.7 g (5.29 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4230 mAh | Li-Po 3000 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Flowing Silver, Deep Blue | Polished Graphite, Bright Cherry, Dark Red |
| Models | CPH2083, CPH2071 | PAGA0004, PAGA0004IN, PAGA0033IN, PAGA0033 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 1.32 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) | 0.28 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A11k
- More powerful Helio P35 chipset for smoother performance
- Potentially better image processing due to ISP
- Slightly better GPU performance for casual gaming
- Charging speed likely slower than Moto E6 Plus
- Battery capacity not specified
Motorola Moto E6 Plus
- 10W wired charging for faster top-ups
- Potentially longer battery life due to lower performance demands
- Reliable and simple user experience
- Less powerful Helio P22 chipset
- Slower CPU and GPU performance
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, typical for this price point. Specifics like resolution and brightness are not provided, but we can assume they are similar – likely 720p+ resolution. The focus here isn’t on visual fidelity, but on basic usability. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor. Color accuracy will likely be standard for budget phones, prioritizing power efficiency over color calibration.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be limited. Details on sensor size and aperture are unavailable, but given the price point, expectations should be tempered. Both likely feature a primary camera paired with a depth sensor. The A11k’s camera system is likely to offer slightly better image processing due to the more powerful ISP within the Helio P35. However, in good lighting conditions, both will capture acceptable photos for social media sharing. Low-light performance will be a significant weakness on both, with noticeable noise and lack of detail. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and offers minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A11k’s Mediatek Helio P35 (12nm) features an octa-core CPU with a split configuration: four cores clocked at 2.35 GHz (Cortex-A53) and four at 1.8 GHz (Cortex-A53). This contrasts with the Motorola Moto E6 Plus’s Helio P22 (12nm) which has an octa-core CPU clocked uniformly at 2.0 GHz (Cortex-A53). The higher clock speeds on the A11k’s prime cores provide a noticeable performance advantage in CPU-bound tasks. While both use the same Cortex-A53 architecture, the P35’s configuration allows for better task prioritization. The P35 also has a slightly more capable GPU, offering a marginal improvement in graphics performance. Neither phone is a gaming powerhouse, but the A11k will handle less demanding titles with greater fluidity.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but both likely house batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. The Moto E6 Plus has a clear advantage with its 10W wired charging. The Oppo A11k’s charging speed is unknown, but likely slower. While the A11k’s more efficient chipset *may* offset some of the charging disadvantage, the E6 Plus will offer quicker top-ups. Users who frequently find themselves away from a power outlet will benefit from the E6 Plus’s faster charging capability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A11k if you prioritize responsiveness and smoother performance for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light gaming. You'll appreciate the extra processing power for a more fluid user experience. Buy the Motorola Moto E6 Plus if battery longevity and the convenience of 10W charging are paramount, and you primarily use your phone for basic communication and minimal app usage. It’s a solid choice for those who need a reliable, long-lasting device without demanding performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A11k struggle with popular apps like Facebook and WhatsApp?
The Oppo A11k’s Helio P35 chipset should handle Facebook and WhatsApp without significant issues. While it won’t offer a blazing-fast experience, the increased CPU power compared to the Moto E6 Plus will result in smoother scrolling and faster app loading times. However, running multiple apps simultaneously may cause some slowdown.
❓ Is the Motorola Moto E6 Plus a good choice for elderly users who primarily make calls and send texts?
Yes, the Motorola Moto E6 Plus is an excellent choice for elderly users with basic needs. Its simple interface, reliable performance for calls and texts, and longer battery life (potentially) make it a practical and user-friendly option. The 10W charging also ensures it can be quickly topped up when needed.
❓ Can either of these phones handle basic mobile games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers?
Both phones can handle casual games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers, but the Oppo A11k will provide a smoother experience. The Helio P35’s slightly more capable GPU will result in fewer frame drops and more consistent performance during gameplay. Don't expect to play graphically demanding games on either device.
