The Oppo A11k and Infinix Smart 4c represent the extreme end of the smartphone price spectrum, targeting first-time buyers or those needing a reliable secondary device. Both phones aim to deliver essential functionality at an incredibly low cost, but significant differences in their core hardware dictate which device offers the better experience. This comparison will dissect those differences, focusing on performance, usability, and overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing responsiveness and multitasking, the Oppo A11k is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Helio P35 chipset, with its octa-core configuration, provides a noticeably smoother experience than the quad-core Helio A22 in the Infinix Smart 4c. While both phones are limited, the A11k offers a more future-proofed, albeit still basic, experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 22. Released 2020, June 22 | 2019, November. Released 2019, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 155.9 x 75.5 x 8.3 mm (6.14 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 167 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.57 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 8 MP
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 4230 mAh | 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Flowing Silver, Deep Blue | Midnight Black, Quetzal Cyan, Cosmic Purple |
| Models | CPH2083, CPH2071 | X653C |
| Price | About 100 EUR | - |
| SAR | 1.32 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) | - |
Oppo A11k
- More powerful octa-core processor for smoother multitasking.
- Potentially faster app launch times.
- Slightly better equipped for future software updates.
- May consume slightly more battery than the Infinix Smart 4c.
- Likely similar camera performance to the Smart 4c.
Infinix Smart 4c
- Potentially longer battery life due to less powerful processor.
- Lower price point (likely).
- Simpler user experience for those new to smartphones.
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Oppo A11k.
- Struggles with multitasking and demanding apps.
- Less future-proofed.
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo nor Infinix provide detailed display specifications beyond resolution. However, given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The real difference lies in the processing power needed to drive them. The A11k’s more powerful chipset will handle UI animations and scrolling more smoothly, even if the panels themselves are similar in quality. Expect both to struggle in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both devices likely feature basic camera setups, and detailed sensor information is scarce. It’s safe to assume both rely on a primary sensor for most shots, supplemented by auxiliary lenses of limited utility. Without specific megapixel counts or aperture details, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner. Image processing will likely be similar, prioritizing compression over detail. The A11k’s slightly more powerful chipset *may* allow for marginally faster image processing, but the difference will be minimal.
Performance
The core differentiator is the chipset. The Oppo A11k’s Mediatek Helio P35 (12nm) features an octa-core CPU comprised of four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.35 GHz and four at 1.8 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Infinix Smart 4c’s Mediatek Helio A22 (12nm) which utilizes a quad-core CPU with four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. The A11k’s octa-core design and higher clock speeds translate to significantly improved multi-tasking and app launch times. While both chips are entry-level, the P35 offers a more responsive experience, particularly when switching between applications. The A22 is adequate for basic tasks but will struggle with anything demanding.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified in the provided data. However, given the target market and hardware, both phones likely feature batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. The less powerful Helio A22 in the Infinix Smart 4c will consume less power, potentially resulting in slightly longer battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the A11k’s more efficient chipset design (despite having more cores) could mitigate this difference. Charging wattage is also unknown, but both will likely ship with basic 5W chargers, resulting in slow charging times.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A11k if you need a phone capable of handling more than just basic calling and messaging – light social media use, occasional web browsing, and running a few apps simultaneously will be less frustrating. Buy the Infinix Smart 4c if your primary need is a very affordable device for essential communication and you prioritize maximizing battery life over performance, accepting a slower and more limited user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A11k handle popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook smoothly?
Yes, the Oppo A11k’s Helio P35 chipset should handle apps like WhatsApp and Facebook without significant lag. However, running multiple apps simultaneously or using more demanding features within these apps may cause slowdowns. It’s a step up from the A22 in the Smart 4c for these common tasks.
❓ Is the Infinix Smart 4c suitable for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Absolutely. The Infinix Smart 4c is perfectly adequate for basic communication. Its Helio A22 chipset is sufficient for making calls, sending texts, and using simple contact management features. The focus is on affordability and essential functionality, making it a good choice for users with minimal smartphone needs.
❓ Can either of these phones run the latest versions of Android?
Both phones likely shipped with older versions of Android, potentially with a Go Edition variant to optimize performance on limited hardware. Updates are unlikely to be frequent or extensive, so don't expect to be running the newest Android version for long.
