The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Oppo A11, powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon 665, and the Tecno Spark Go 2, utilizing Unisoc's T7250, represent compelling options for first-time smartphone buyers or those seeking a reliable secondary device. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a more established chipset ecosystem, the Oppo A11 emerges as the slightly better choice. While the Tecno Spark Go 2 boasts faster 15W charging, the Snapdragon 665 in the A11 provides a more refined and predictable user experience, particularly in multitasking and app loading.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2025, June 24 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, June |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.6 x 9.1 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 165.6 x 77 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~263 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Unisoc T7250 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6.0 | Android 15, HIOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Quad | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF
2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired
Reverse wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Purple, Lake Green, Cloud White | Ink Black, Titanium Grey, Veil White, Turquoise Green |
| Models | PCHM10, PCHT10 | KM4 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 80 EUR |
Oppo A11
- Proven Snapdragon 665 chipset for reliable performance
- Qualcomm’s software optimization for smoother experience
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Slower 10W charging
- Likely less impressive battery life compared to the Tecno
Tecno Spark Go 2
- Faster 15W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Unisoc T7250 offers decent performance for basic tasks
- Less efficient 12nm process node
- Unisoc chipset may exhibit more thermal throttling
- Potentially less refined software experience
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the lack of display specifications beyond the core chipsets, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but rather durability and power efficiency. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both, and color accuracy will be standard for the segment. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced panel technologies like LTPO is expected.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both devices feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The image processing capabilities of Qualcomm’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 665 generally provide more natural-looking images with better dynamic range compared to Unisoc’s offerings at this price point. Expect both to struggle in low-light conditions, and any 'macro' lenses included are likely to be of limited utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A11’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm) utilizes a Kryo CPU architecture, offering a balance of performance and efficiency. Its octa-core configuration (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) is designed for responsive multitasking. Conversely, the Tecno Spark Go 2’s Unisoc T7250 (12nm) employs a Cortex-A75/A55 configuration (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55). While the A75 cores offer higher peak performance, the 12nm process node is less efficient than the Snapdragon’s 11nm, potentially leading to more heat generation under sustained load. The Snapdragon 665 benefits from Qualcomm’s extensive software optimization, resulting in smoother app launches and overall system responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Tecno Spark Go 2’s 15W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Oppo A11’s 10W charging. This translates to significantly faster top-up times, crucial for users who can’t afford lengthy charging cycles. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the more efficient Snapdragon 665 in the A11 may offset the charging speed difference to some extent, potentially offering comparable all-day battery life with moderate usage. The 12nm process of the Unisoc T7250 will likely consume more power, impacting overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A11 if you need a phone with a proven chipset for smoother daily use and anticipate running multiple apps simultaneously. Its Snapdragon 665 offers a more stable experience. Buy the Tecno Spark Go 2 if you prioritize faster charging speeds and are primarily focused on basic smartphone functions like calls, messaging, and light social media use. The 15W charging is a significant advantage for those who frequently find themselves with low battery.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T7250 in the Tecno Spark Go 2 struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Unisoc T7250 can run PUBG Mobile, but likely at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain a playable experience. The Snapdragon 665 in the Oppo A11 will offer a smoother gaming experience overall, even if not at flagship levels. Expect frame drops and potential lag on the Tecno with higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 15W charging on the Tecno Spark Go 2 compared to the Oppo A11's 10W?
While exact times depend on battery capacity (which isn't specified), 15W charging will typically reduce charging time by approximately 30-50% compared to 10W. This means a full charge could take around 2-3 hours on the Tecno, versus 3-4 hours on the Oppo A11.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 665 in the Oppo A11 still a relevant chipset in 2024?
While not the newest chipset, the Snapdragon 665 remains a capable performer for basic smartphone tasks in 2024. It offers a good balance of performance and efficiency, and benefits from Qualcomm's mature software support. It's perfectly adequate for everyday use, social media, and light multitasking.
