The Oppo A11 and Motorola Moto G8 Play represent two compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they achieve this with different approaches to core hardware. This comparison dissects the key differences between the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665-powered Oppo A11 and the MediaTek Helio P70M-equipped Motorola Moto G8 Play, helping you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a slightly more efficient chipset, the Oppo A11 emerges as the better choice. While the Moto G8 Play offers a competitive CPU clock speed, the Snapdragon 665’s architecture and 11nm process provide a more balanced experience, particularly in multitasking and longer gaming sessions.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2019, October. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.6 x 9.1 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 157.6 x 75.4 x 9 mm (6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 183.6 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70M (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF
2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.25µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired
Reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Purple, Lake Green, Cloud White | Black onyx, Magenta red |
| Models | PCHM10, PCHT10 | XT2015, XT2015-2 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.62 W/kg (head) 1.68 W/kg (body) |
Oppo A11
- More efficient Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Better thermal management for sustained performance
- Potentially longer battery life due to chipset efficiency
- Slightly lower CPU clock speed compared to Moto G8 Play
- 10W charging is slow
Motorola Moto G8 Play
- Higher CPU clock speed for bursty tasks
- Potentially lower price point
- Larger physical size may offer a bigger screen
- Less efficient Helio P70M chipset
- Potential for thermal throttling under load
- 10W charging is slow
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing power, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The Moto G8 Play’s larger physical size *may* translate to a slightly larger screen, but without specific display specs, it’s difficult to assess. Color accuracy and brightness are likely similar, targeting basic usability rather than media consumption excellence.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature basic camera setups. The absence of information regarding sensor size or optical image stabilization (OIS) indicates neither phone will excel in low-light photography. Image processing will likely be the differentiating factor, with Oppo historically leaning towards more vibrant, saturated images, while Motorola often aims for a more natural look. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely a marketing feature with limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A11’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm) utilizes a Kryo CPU architecture, split into performance (Kryo 260 Gold) and efficiency (Kryo 260 Silver) cores. This allows for dynamic power allocation, optimizing for both speed and battery life. The Motorola Moto G8 Play’s MediaTek Helio P70M (12nm) features Cortex-A73 and A53 cores. While the A73 cores boast a higher 2.1 GHz clock speed compared to the Snapdragon’s 2.0 GHz, the 12nm process is less efficient. This means the Helio P70M will likely generate more heat under sustained load, potentially leading to thermal throttling and reduced performance over time. The Snapdragon 665’s 11nm process gives it an edge in thermal management and sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 10W charging, indicating a similar charging experience – relatively slow by modern standards. The actual battery capacity isn’t specified, but given the target market, we can assume capacities are comparable (around 4000-5000 mAh). The Snapdragon 665’s superior power efficiency could translate to slightly longer battery life for the Oppo A11, even with a similar capacity, as it draws less power during typical usage. The 10W charging will require several hours to fully charge either device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A11 if you need a phone that can handle everyday tasks and light gaming without significant slowdowns, and if you value a chipset known for its power efficiency. Buy the Motorola Moto G8 Play if you prioritize raw CPU clock speed for bursty tasks and are looking for a potentially lower price point, understanding that sustained performance might be less consistent.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P70M in the Moto G8 Play overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The MediaTek Helio P70M, built on a 12nm process, is more prone to thermal throttling than the Snapdragon 665 (11nm). While it can handle short gaming bursts, prolonged gaming sessions may lead to reduced performance as the chip heats up and reduces clock speeds to prevent damage.
❓ Does the Oppo A11 support fast charging, and how long does it take to fully charge?
The Oppo A11 supports only 10W wired charging. This is a relatively slow charging standard, and a full charge from 0% to 100% will likely take around 2.5 to 3.5 hours. It also supports reverse wired charging, allowing it to charge other devices, albeit slowly.
❓ Which phone is better for multitasking between several apps?
The Oppo A11, with its Snapdragon 665 and optimized Kryo architecture, is better suited for multitasking. The Snapdragon’s efficient core allocation allows it to handle multiple apps simultaneously without significant slowdowns, whereas the Helio P70M may struggle with heavier multitasking loads.
