Oppo A1 vs Oppo A78: A Head-to-Head Budget Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A1 takes the lead with its significantly faster 67W charging and the more powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset. While the A78 offers a slightly larger display and potentially better camera software, the A1's performance and charging speed make it the overall winner for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A1 | Oppo A78 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | IP54 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 04 | 2023, January 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 14 | Available. Released 2023, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g or 193 g (6.74 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Panda glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 76% in 30 min | 33W wired, PD, 52% in 30 min, 100% in 67 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Glowing Black, Glowing Purple |
| Models | PHS110 | CPH2483, CPH2495 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 188.99 / $ 102.92 / ₹ 16,290 |
Oppo A1
- Faster 67W Charging
- More Powerful Snapdragon 695 Chipset
- Potentially better performance
- More efficient chipset (6nm)
- Potentially lower screen resolution
- Camera software might be less refined than A78
Oppo A78
- Larger Display (potentially FHD+)
- Potentially better camera software
- Slightly more premium design (likely)
- Slower 33W Charging
- Less powerful Dimensity 700 Chipset
- Less efficient chipset (7nm)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch display, but the A78 likely has a slightly higher resolution (likely FHD+ vs A1's potentially HD+). The A78 might also have a slightly better panel, potentially with better color accuracy, though both are expected to be LCDs. The A78's larger size could make it more immersive for video watching.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely feature a triple-camera setup (main, ultrawide, macro), the A78 might have a slightly higher resolution main sensor. Software processing plays a crucial role here, and Oppo's optimizations could give the A78 an edge in certain scenarios. Expect decent image quality from both, but not flagship-level performance.
Performance
The Oppo A1's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset is generally considered more powerful than the Dimensity 700 in the A78. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A1. The 6nm process of the A1's chipset also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
The Oppo A1 boasts significantly faster charging (67W) compared to the A78's 33W. While both likely have similar battery capacities (around 5000mAh), the A1 will charge much quicker, a major convenience factor.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A1 is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and smooth performance for everyday tasks and light gaming. The Oppo A78 is a better fit for those who value a larger screen for media consumption and potentially a more refined camera experience, even if it means slower charging.