Oppo A1 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 12 Pro edges out the Oppo A1 Pro thanks to its superior display brightness, longer active battery life, and generally more refined software experience. While the A1 Pro boasts faster charging, the Redmi Note 12 Pro provides a more well-rounded package for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A1 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 16 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 25 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 80% in 30 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | PHQ110 | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490526 (v9) GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A1 Pro
- Fast 67W Charging
- Sleek Design
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially less refined software
- Camera details are limited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Bright 890 nits Display
- Excellent Battery Life (97h Endurance)
- Dimensity 1080 Performance
- PD3.0 Charging
- Charging slightly slower than A1 Pro
- Design may be less striking
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 890 nits, significantly brighter than the A1 Pro's likely lower brightness. While the A1 Pro may have a good quality AMOLED panel, the Redmi Note 12 Pro's higher brightness offers better visibility in sunlight and a more immersive viewing experience. The Redmi Note 12 Pro's infinite contrast ratio also contributes to richer colors and deeper blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro likely has a slight edge. While specific camera specs are missing for the A1 Pro, the Redmi Note 12 Pro's reputation for good image processing and versatile camera setup gives it an advantage. Expect detailed photos and decent video quality from both devices, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro may offer slightly better dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the Oppo A1 Pro is a capable chipset, but the Dimensity 1080 in the Redmi Note 12 Pro offers a noticeable performance advantage. The Dimensity 1080's Cortex-A78 cores provide better single-core performance, while the overall architecture delivers smoother multitasking and gaming. Both phones handle everyday tasks well, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro feels snappier.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 97 hours and an active use score of 12:08 hours. The Oppo A1 Pro's battery life is likely good, but not as exceptional as the Redmi Note 12 Pro. The A1 Pro's 67W charging is faster, allowing for quicker top-ups, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro's larger capacity and efficient chipset provide longer overall usage.
Buying Guide
The Oppo A1 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a sleek design. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display, extended battery life, and a more polished overall experience.