Oppo A1 Pro vs Oppo Reno8: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 edges out the A1 Pro thanks to its faster charging, slightly more powerful chipset, and potentially better camera capabilities. However, the A1 Pro offers excellent value with its 67W charging and Snapdragon 695, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A1 Pro | Oppo Reno8 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 16 | 2022, July 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 25 | Available. Released 2022, July 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 80% in 30 min Reverse wired | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black |
| Models | PHQ110 | CPH2359 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 105h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.7 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 619610a (v9) GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A1 Pro
- Excellent value for money
- Fast 67W charging
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reverse wired charging
- Less powerful chipset than Reno8
- Potentially lower camera quality
- Brightness data missing
Oppo Reno8
- Faster 80W charging
- More powerful Dimensity 1300 chipset
- Potentially better camera system
- Excellent battery life (105h endurance)
- Potentially higher price
- Infinite contrast ratio is a marketing term
- Less value compared to A1 Pro
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays, but the Reno8 boasts a measured 633 nits max brightness, suggesting slightly better outdoor visibility. The Reno8's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but likely indicates good contrast. The A1 Pro's display is likely good, but lacks specific brightness data. Screen size and resolution are likely similar, around 6.4-6.5 inches with FHD+ resolution.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Reno8 likely has a more advanced camera system. The Dimensity 1300 often pairs with better camera sensors and image processing. The A1 Pro's camera is likely adequate, but won't match the Reno8's image quality, especially in low light. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Reno8's Dimensity 1300 generally outperforms the Snapdragon 695 in the A1 Pro. The Dimensity 1300's Cortex-A78 cores provide a noticeable boost in CPU performance, making it better suited for gaming and demanding applications. The A1 Pro's Snapdragon 695 is still capable for everyday tasks, but won't handle intensive workloads as smoothly.
Battery Life
The Reno8 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 105 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The A1 Pro's battery capacity is likely similar, but the Reno8's power efficiency gives it the edge. The Reno8's 80W charging is significantly faster than the A1 Pro's 67W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo A1 Pro? Users prioritizing value and decent performance for everyday tasks, especially those who appreciate fast charging. Who should buy the Oppo Reno8? Users seeking a more premium experience with faster charging, potentially better camera quality, and a slightly more powerful processor for demanding apps and games.