The Oppo A1 Pro represents a modern budget offering, focusing on 5G connectivity and fast charging, while the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom, though older, was a flagship known for its innovative periscope zoom camera. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs and budget in today's market.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A1 Pro offers a better overall value. While the Reno 10x Zoom boasts a more powerful (though older) processor, the A1 Pro’s faster 67W charging and modern 5G connectivity make it more practical for daily use. The Reno 10x Zoom remains compelling for its unique zoom capabilities, but its age shows.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 16 | 2019, April. Released 2019, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 25 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF OIS, 5x optical zoom, 10x hybrid zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide) | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 80% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Ocean Green, Jet Black, Mist Pink, Ocean Blue |
| Models | PHQ110 | CPH1919, PCCM00 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 1020 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 107h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.7 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 364220 (v7), 407473 (v8)
GeekBench: 10395 (v4.4), 2103 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo A1 Pro
- Faster 67W charging for quick power-ups
- Modern 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Camera likely lacks the zoom capabilities of the Reno 10x Zoom
- Performance is lower than the Snapdragon 855 in raw power
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
- Unique 10x hybrid zoom camera system
- More powerful Snapdragon 855 processor for demanding tasks
- Good battery endurance (107h)
- Slower 20W charging
- Older chipset prone to thermal throttling
- Lacks modern 5G connectivity
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s display is measured at 440 nits of peak brightness, which was respectable for its time, but likely appears dimmer compared to modern displays. The A1 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, but given its market positioning, it likely prioritizes efficiency over peak brightness. Both displays feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. The Reno 10x Zoom’s age means it lacks features like adaptive refresh rates found in newer phones, potentially impacting smoothness during scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s primary selling point is its 10x hybrid zoom capability, achieved through a periscope lens. While the A1 Pro’s camera specifications are not detailed, it’s unlikely to match the Reno 10x Zoom’s zoom range. The Reno 10x Zoom’s image processing, while good for its time, will likely be less refined than modern algorithms. The A1 Pro may compensate with improved computational photography features. The Reno 10x Zoom’s camera excels in scenarios requiring significant optical zoom, while the A1 Pro will likely perform better in standard photography conditions due to its newer image signal processor (ISP).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo A1 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Reno 10x Zoom features the Snapdragon 855 (7nm). While the 855 is theoretically more powerful with its 1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 core and higher clock speeds, the 6nm process of the 695 offers improved power efficiency. The 855, being an older generation, is more prone to thermal throttling under sustained load. The A1 Pro’s Kryo 660 cores, while clocked lower, benefit from architectural improvements and the more efficient manufacturing process. The Reno 10x Zoom’s performance will be noticeable in demanding tasks, but the A1 Pro’s efficiency will translate to better battery life during typical usage.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 107 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the A1 Pro). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Oppo A1 Pro boasts 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 80% charge in just 30 minutes, a significant advantage over the Reno 10x Zoom’s 20W charging. This faster charging is a major convenience factor for the A1 Pro, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day. The A1 Pro also supports reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the Reno 10x Zoom.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A1 Pro if you prioritize 5G connectivity, fast charging, and a modern software experience on a budget. It’s ideal for everyday users, social media enthusiasts, and those who want a reliable phone without breaking the bank. Buy the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom if you absolutely need a dedicated periscope zoom camera for long-range photography and are willing to accept an older chipset and slower charging speeds. It’s best for photography enthusiasts who value optical zoom above all else.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 855 in the Reno 10x Zoom struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 855, while powerful, is an older chipset and is prone to thermal throttling under sustained load. While it can run Genshin Impact, you may experience frame drops and reduced performance after prolonged gaming sessions. The A1 Pro’s Snapdragon 695, while less powerful overall, will maintain more consistent performance due to its more efficient design.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Oppo A1 Pro compared to the 20W charging on the Reno 10x Zoom?
The 67W charging on the A1 Pro can charge the phone to 80% in approximately 30 minutes. The 20W charging on the Reno 10x Zoom will take significantly longer – likely over 90 minutes to reach a full charge. This difference is substantial and provides a much more convenient charging experience with the A1 Pro.
❓ Is the 10x zoom on the Reno 10x Zoom still relevant in 2024?
While the 10x zoom is still a unique feature, image processing technology has advanced significantly. Newer phones with digital zoom and computational photography can often produce comparable results, albeit without the optical advantage. However, if you specifically need a dedicated optical zoom lens for long-range photography, the Reno 10x Zoom remains a viable option.
