Oppo A1 Pro vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a brighter display, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 7030 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, and the measured 10:28h active use score demonstrates superior endurance, despite the similar charging speeds.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo A1 Pro | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 16 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 25 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | AGC DT-Star2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 80% in 30 min Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | PHQ110 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Oppo A1 Pro
- 67W fast charging with reverse wired charging
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G offers reliable 5G connectivity
- Oppo’s ColorOS is generally well-optimized
- Performance lags behind the Dimensity 7030
- Limited battery life data available
- Display brightness likely lower than the Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Brighter 1073 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility
- MediaTek Dimensity 7030 provides superior performance
- Impressive battery life with 10:28h active use
- 68W charging is only marginally faster than the Oppo
- Motorola’s software can be perceived as ‘bloatware’ by some
- Camera details are currently limited
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Oppo A1 Pro, which lacks published brightness data. While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the display’s brightness impacts the overall user experience, especially in sunny conditions. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely benefits from more aggressive power management, contributing to its longer battery life.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by a lack of specific sensor information for both devices. However, focusing on lens quality and image processing is key. Motorola typically emphasizes natural color reproduction, while Oppo often leans towards more vibrant, saturated images. Without knowing the main sensor resolution or aperture, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage, but this information is currently unavailable. We can assume both phones will feature a standard array of camera modes, but image quality will ultimately depend on the sensor and software optimization.
Performance
The MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offers a performance advantage over the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. The Cortex-A78 architecture is generally more efficient and powerful than the Kryo 660. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 7030’s CPU configuration translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The Snapdragon 695 is adequate for basic tasks, but the Edge 40 Neo will handle demanding applications and games more effectively.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s endurance rating of 80 hours and a real-world active use score of 10:28h demonstrate superior battery performance compared to the Oppo A1 Pro, which lacks comparable data. While both support fast charging – 68W for the Motorola and 67W for the Oppo – the Edge 40 Neo’s efficiency allows it to achieve 50% charge in 15 minutes. The Oppo A1 Pro claims 80% in 30 minutes. The Edge 40 Neo’s combination of efficient chipset and optimized software results in a more practical battery experience for demanding users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo A1 Pro if you prioritize a brand with a strong track record in fast charging and are comfortable with a slightly less powerful processor for everyday tasks. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value a brighter, more vibrant display, a more capable chipset for gaming and multitasking, and longer battery life during active use. The Edge 40 Neo is the better choice for power users.