OnePlus Nord vs Xiaomi Poco F4: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Poco F4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset provides a significant boost over the Nord’s Snapdragon 765G. However, the OnePlus Nord remains a strong contender, especially if found at a significantly lower price point, offering a solid all-around experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Nord | Xiaomi Poco F4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 78 SA/NSA - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 21 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, August 04 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 158.3 x 73.3 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 2.89 x 0.32 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.6 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, OxygenOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.5, 105˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4115 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue Marble, Gray Onyx (Gray Ash) | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | AC2001, AC2003 | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | € 101.45 / £ 119.99 | ₹ 16,999 |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | $ 299.00 | - |
| 256GB 12GB RAM | $ 329.99 | - |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | C$ 865.00 | - |
| RENEWED | £ 172.00 | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.6 LUFS (Average) | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 315641 (v8) GeekBench: 7844 (v4.4), 1953 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
OnePlus Nord
- Potentially lower price point
- Clean and streamlined software experience
- Good all-around battery life
- Less powerful processor
- Dimmer display compared to Poco F4
- Slower charging speeds
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 870)
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Much faster 67W charging
- Potentially higher price
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be more cluttered
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 immediately distinguishes itself with a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1003 nits compared to the Nord’s 756 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks, but the brightness difference is a key advantage for the Poco F4. While neither specification details refresh rate, the brighter panel on the Poco F4 will be more enjoyable for media consumption and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, given the price points, it’s unlikely either features a groundbreaking camera system. The Poco F4’s advantage likely stems from its more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) integrated within the Snapdragon 870, potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the chipset advantage favors the Poco F4.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F4’s Snapdragon 870 5G is a substantial upgrade over the Nord’s Snapdragon 765G. The 870 features a Kryo 585 core clocked at 3.2 GHz, compared to the Nord’s 2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime. This architectural and clock speed difference results in noticeably faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The Poco F4’s CPU configuration (1x3.2GHz + 3x2.42GHz + 4x1.80GHz) provides a more robust foundation for sustained workloads than the Nord’s (1x2.4GHz + 1x2.2GHz + 6x1.8GHz).
Battery Life
Both the OnePlus Nord and Xiaomi Poco F4 achieve an endurance rating of 100-101 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Poco F4’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support is significantly faster than the Nord’s 30W charging. The Poco F4 claims a 100% charge in 38 minutes, while the Nord takes 30 minutes to reach 70%. This faster charging is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Nord if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery life and a clean software experience, and are comfortable with slightly less demanding tasks. It’s ideal for users who value a balanced feature set over outright speed. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and rapid charging. This phone is for users who want near-flagship performance without breaking the bank, and don't mind a potentially more customized software experience.