OnePlus Nord N300 vs. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023): Which Budget 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord N300 offers a more compelling package. Its significantly brighter display (623 nits) and faster 33W charging outweigh the Moto G Stylus 5G’s slightly more efficient chipset. However, users who heavily rely on a stylus will find the Moto G Stylus 5G indispensable.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Nord N300 | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat13 390/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 24 | 2023, May 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 03 | Available. Released 2023, June 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 162.8 x 73.8 x 9.2 mm (6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 12, OxygenOS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Jade | Cosmic Black, Rose Champagne |
| Models | CPH2389 | XT2315-1, XT2315-4 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | $ 93.43 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 114h | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1506:1 (nominal) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 335440 (v9) GeekBench: 1780 (v5.1) GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
OnePlus Nord N300
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Potentially better single-core performance
- Less efficient chipset
- Larger process node (6nm vs 4nm)
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)
- More efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- Integrated stylus for note-taking and navigation
- Likely better low-light camera performance
- Slower 20W wired charging
- Dimmer display
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord N300 boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 623 nits, compared to the Moto G Stylus 5G’s unlisted brightness (estimated around 400-500 nits based on Motorola’s typical offerings). This makes the Nord N300 far more usable outdoors. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Nord N300’s 1506:1 contrast ratio suggests better color reproduction. The Moto G Stylus 5G’s larger screen size (6.6 inches vs. 6.56 inches) may appeal to some, but the Nord N300’s superior brightness is a significant advantage.
Camera Comparison
Neither phone is a camera powerhouse, but the Moto G Stylus 5G likely has an advantage due to its larger main sensor (50MP vs. the Nord N300’s 48MP). While megapixel count isn’t everything, a larger sensor generally captures more light, resulting in better low-light performance. Both phones likely feature similar image processing algorithms, focusing on enhancing colors and details. The inclusion of a stylus on the Moto G Stylus 5G could also be utilized for more precise camera control and editing.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm), a more modern and efficient chipset than the OnePlus Nord N300’s MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm). The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1’s Cortex-A78 cores (4x2.2 GHz) offer a performance edge over the Dimensity 810’s Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.4 GHz) in multi-threaded tasks. However, the Dimensity 810’s higher clock speeds on its prime cores might provide a slight advantage in single-core performance. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 should translate to better thermal management and sustained performance under load, though real-world differences may be minimal in everyday use.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord N300 boasts an endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting solid battery life. However, the Moto G Stylus 5G’s more efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset could potentially offer comparable or even slightly better real-world battery performance despite lacking specific endurance data. The Nord N300’s 33W wired charging is a significant advantage, allowing for much faster top-ups compared to the Moto G Stylus 5G’s 20W charging. This difference in charging speed is crucial for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Nord N300 if you prioritize a vibrant display for media consumption, need rapid charging to minimize downtime, and don't require a stylus. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) if you frequently take notes, sketch, or navigate with a stylus, and value a more power-efficient processor for potentially longer sustained performance.