OnePlus Nord N200 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A14 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a smoother experience, the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (specifically the Exynos 1330 variant) is the better choice. The more modern 5nm Exynos 1330 offers a noticeable performance uplift over the 8nm Snapdragon 480 in the Nord N200 5G, despite slightly slower charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Nord N200 5G | Samsung Galaxy A14 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 71, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6 - USA | 2, 5, 66, 77 Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat15 800/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 2, 25, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Canada | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 21 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 25 | Available. Released 2023, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 74.9 x 8.3 mm (6.42 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.49 inches, 102.2 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146BOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146P |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) - SM-A146BMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) - SM-A146P |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146BMali-G57 MC2 - SM-A146P |
| OS | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI Core 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - USA onlymicroSDXC (dedicated slot) - International |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1 | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1 | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (Exynos 1330 chipset only), recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue Quantum | Black, Light Green, Dark Red, Silver |
| Models | DE2118, DE2117 | SM-A146B, SM-A146B/DS, SM-A146P, SM-A146P/DS, SM-A146U, SM-A146U1, SM-A146U1/DS, SM-A146W, SM-A146P/N, SM-A146P/DSN, SM-S146VL, SM-A146M |
| Price | About 170 EUR | $ 77.63 / C$ 151.00 / £ 97.00 / € 159.79 / ₹ 14,990 |
| SAR | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 1.28 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 130h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1334:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 307886 (v9) GeekBench: 1727 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
OnePlus Nord N200 5G
- Faster 18W charging
- Potentially more compact form factor
- Generally lower price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 480 chipset
- 8nm process node leads to lower efficiency
- Likely inferior camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
- More powerful Exynos 1330 (or Dimensity 700) chipset
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- 5nm process node for better efficiency
- Slower 15W charging
- Larger size may not suit all users
- Potential for software bloat (Samsung)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 519 nits compared to an unlisted value for the Nord N200 5G, making it significantly more usable outdoors. Both displays share a 1334:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar color depth and black levels. However, the larger screen size of the A14 5G (6.6 inches vs. 6.43 inches) provides a more immersive viewing experience. While neither phone specifies refresh rates, the A14's brightness advantage is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack detailed camera specifications. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Samsung’s image processing expertise, the A14 5G is likely to deliver more refined images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G comes in two variants: the Exynos 1330 (5nm) and the MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Exynos 1330, with its Cortex-A78 performance cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, offers a substantial performance advantage over the OnePlus Nord N200 5G’s Snapdragon 480 (8nm) and its 2.0 GHz Kryo 460 cores. The 5nm process node of the Exynos 1330 also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. The Dimensity 700 variant is still a step up from the Snapdragon 480, but the Exynos version is the clear winner.
Battery Life
Both the OnePlus Nord N200 5G and Samsung Galaxy A14 5G achieve an endurance rating of 130 hours, suggesting comparable battery life in typical usage scenarios. The A14 5G supports 15W wired charging, while the N200 5G offers 18W. While the N200 5G has a slightly faster charging rate, the difference is unlikely to be significant in real-world use, and the A14 5G’s more efficient chipset may offset this advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Nord N200 5G if you prioritize a lighter, more compact phone and are primarily focused on basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light streaming. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G if you prefer a larger display, demand better performance for multitasking and occasional gaming, and value a brighter, more visible screen in outdoor conditions.