OnePlus Nord N200 5G vs. Nord N10 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord N10 5G remains the better choice. While the N200 5G offers a slightly newer chipset, the N10 5G’s faster 30W charging and demonstrably brighter display, coupled with a more mature software experience, outweigh the N200’s incremental improvements.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Nord N200 5G | OnePlus Nord N10 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 71, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6 - USA | 1, 3, 7, 28, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat15 800/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1024/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 2, 25, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Canada | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 21 | 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 25 | Available. Released 2020, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 74.9 x 8.3 mm (6.42 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 163 x 74.7 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.49 inches, 102.2 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.49 inches, 101.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619L |
| OS | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1 | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1 | 16 MP, f/2.1 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue Quantum | Midnight Ice |
| Models | DE2118, DE2117 | BE2029, BE2025, BE2026, BE2028 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 279579 (v8) GeekBench: 1848 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
OnePlus Nord N200 5G
- Slightly newer chipset (Snapdragon 480 5G)
- Potentially more efficient 8nm process
- May receive longer software support
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely dimmer display
- Potentially lower performance than N10 5G
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
- Faster 30W charging
- Brighter display (440 nits)
- More powerful Snapdragon 690 5G chipset
- Older chipset
- May have shorter software support lifespan
- Potentially less efficient chipset
Display Comparison
The Nord N10 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 440 nits, compared to an unlisted value for the N200 5G (likely lower, based on typical panel choices in this price bracket). This brightness difference translates to better outdoor visibility. Furthermore, the N10 5G’s 1447:1 contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and a more vibrant image. While both likely utilize LCD panels, the N10 5G’s superior brightness and contrast provide a more enjoyable viewing experience, especially for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. However, the N10 5G’s likely larger sensor (based on typical configurations for the 690 chipset) and potentially wider aperture would provide better low-light performance. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the N10 5G, if present, would further enhance image clarity and reduce blur. The N200 5G’s camera is likely adequate for casual snapshots, but the N10 5G offers a more capable imaging experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the N200 5G uses the Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G, while the N10 5G features the SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G. The 690, built on the same 8nm process, features Kryo 560 Gold cores clocked at 2.0 GHz alongside 1.7 GHz Silver cores, offering a performance edge over the N200’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold and 1.8 GHz Kryo 460 Silver configuration. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the N10 5G. While both support 5G, the 690 generally offers more robust modem performance.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the N200 5G’s unlisted mAh capacity. However, the N10 5G’s 30W wired charging is a significant advantage over the N200 5G’s 18W charging. This means the N10 5G can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. A full charge from 0-100% on the N10 5G will take considerably less time than on the N200 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Nord N200 5G if you prioritize a newer chipset and are willing to compromise on charging speed and display brightness. It’s a good option for users who primarily stream video and browse the web. Buy the OnePlus Nord N10 5G if you value faster charging, a more visible screen in sunlight, and a generally more responsive user experience, making it ideal for those who frequently game or multitask.